Subject:
|
Re: CM: MotorCurrent
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 3 Jan 1999 17:40:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1359 times
|
| |
|
|
"Anders Isaksson" <isaksson.etuna@REMOVEebox.tninet.se> writes:
> With current monitoring, You can always be sure to stop before the motor is
> overloaded. You have to test a little for finding the correct limit though.
And what would you say the current limit is? I believe Andy Bower used
a limit of 95. Would that apply to your case as well?
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: CM: MotorCurrent
|
| Fredrik Glöckner schrieb in Nachricht ... (...) is (...) though. (...) I did this stall detection too, testing it first with the truck and the fork lifter with a loaded container. I had a current somewhere around 110mA when the truck starts to fall (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: CM: MotorCurrent
|
| Fredrik Glöckner skrev i meddelandet ... (...) is (...) though. (...) I didn't test with full power and stopped motor, so I don't really know. A value of 52 suited the Crusher arms, and that was enough for me. -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: CM: MotorCurrent
|
| (...) Laurentino Martins skrev i meddelandet <4.1.19981210111532....90.220>... (...) tell if the motor running loaded, but I may be wrong! (...) <snip> (...) make sure >children when playing their games with the computer, built their vehicles/robots (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
