| | RE: The Datalog
|
| (...) I'm not sure about that, but they certainly have disclaimers on the firmware itself, which prevents us from reverse engineering it. Now, the original intent was probably to prevent a competitor from designing a system which was compatible with (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: The Datalog
|
| I have noticed a number of comments about the RCX byte code system, including this thread, which would like to see some sort of datalog read function. My question is; Does Lego have a copyright on the byte code interpretation? If not, then wouldn't (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: The Datalog
|
| (...) If we could duplicate the firmware's functions for "the standard" and create a "super set" on top of it for other functions we could really make the RCX a powerful beast. Picture this... Firmware with options when installing it. Do you want (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: The Datalog
|
| (...) It is difficult to see how they could even think they did. Byte code interpretation was a well used implementation technique for Pascal systems back as far as the 70s. UCSD Pascal being one of the best known examples. I think Visual Basic (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: The Datalog
|
| (...) I don't want to crash your party, but I thik you just described legos as in news:lugnet.robotics.legos ;-) Regards, Hakan (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: The Datalog
|
| (...) LegOS doesn't use the standard Byte Codes... So, no I did not... If I was proficient in C I probably would like it. Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: The Datalog
|
| (...) Unfortunately, unless you completely re-engineer the standard firmware you probably won't get the power you need. The jump from LegOS to NQC is relatively painless once you get a working LegOS compiler up and running. I was actually able to (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| |