 | | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) Alexander, What you are describing seems more like an end application (multiple autonomous robots that do X and Y and can communicate using Bluetooth) then an RTOS design. An analogy of your description of using the NXT processor for just the (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) No, as explained Steve, that's bad... Why not the easy one: leJOS Next? Philo (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) Brian, LEGO posted a very nice message on Lugnet about this a couple years ago, after a news story came out, questioning TLG's approach to such things. (URL) short, the answer will be no. I'm sure they'll be quick to put NXT right next to RCX (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Robot new video
|
|
(...) Hi John, hi Philo :) John thanks for your post :) I didn' t take much time to program this robot (on video you can only see random moves)...but did you know which soft I use??....BricxCC....of course!!!! regards Chris from France (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: remote control and rcx
|
|
(...) Well, as a guy who continuously puts 9 volt conenctions on the sensor ports on the RCX (LDCC--love ya lots!!!), what you have to do is separate the wires connecting the RC port and the RCX sensor port with light bricks-- (URL) down until you (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | remote control and rcx
|
|
here's a question to boggle some minds ok here's what i'm trying to do, i have the remote control module from the supersonic racer set and i'm trying to connect it to the input port of the rcx and then having it output to the motors. i dont know if (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) If the mechnisms for control are still applicable, then yeah, you could port over the code that is used to activate the various sensors. In terms of uCOS, after reading half of the kernel book and actually working with it a little bit (the (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) ...snip... (...) Steve, I totally agree with you. A few remarks: 1. There doesn't exist any non-buggy programming language. 2. There doesn't exist any best language. The reason that different languages exist is that there are different people (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) Hitachi processor to an 32 bit ARM7 processor, one would need to rewrite brickOS kernel for the ARM7 processor. But why reinvent the wheel when there is already several really good real-time operating systems for the ARM, including uCOS-II? I (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) Version 3.3.7.10 (2005-10-05) Version 3.3.7.7 Version 3.3.7.6 (2003-10-27) Version 3.3.7.5 (2003-05-22) Version 3.3.7.4 (2003-03-24) Version 3.3.7.3 (2003-03-07) Version 3.3.7.2 (2003-02-12) Version 3.3.7.1 (2003-01-16) Version 3.3.6.6 (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
