 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) You are right when you say the link is Bluetooth. With the RCX the link was IR signals. As long as there is some communication protocol (the more standard, the better) extremely complex logic can get into a robot's behavior. With the RCX I was (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
good analysis. Also keep in mind that Lego sells primarily through retail resellers, so their take is considerably less than the SRP. (Even the Lego stores have huge overhead, being in expensive malls). To sell a product like this at < $250 and make (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
What would I like to implement that won't fit in 256K... check out this list of modules from Pyro: # PyroModuleDirectControl # PyroModuleSequencingControl # PyroModuleBehaviorBasedControl # PyroModuleReinforcementLearning # PyroModuleNeuralNetworks (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) (speaking out from the peanut gallery) I had a big message going about this, but ROSCO has save me the time to type it. Ditto on all the above. LEGO had a price point they wouldn't budge from. According to the Wired article, more than one of (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) Now this is funny. Are you suggesting (A) JB doesn't know much about hardware or (B) JB doesn't know about LEGO's development process? If you select (A) or (B), you should rethink your answer. On Fri, January 13, 2006 1:23 pm, steve wrote: (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
