 | | Re: Editing Makefile (adding comman line arguements)
|
|
(...) Mike, You might start off by checking the manual for GNU Make at (URL) just look within the various makefiles within the brickOS code. Try Makefile.commom at brickOS root. Ed (22 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC's future
|
|
Am 2003-12-02 18:13 Uhr schrieb "John Hansen" unter <JohnBinder@aol.com>: (...) There is a MacNCQ from Robert Bate that works very fine. I like it!! (URL) you should contact him by email rbate@mac.com Ralf (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC's future
|
|
(...) By the way, people who have a CD-booting Windows-compatible PC have free Linux too, via a boot CD that works without repartitioning (or even writing) the boot HDD: (URL) I think I specifically remember seeing rcx serial port tools work there, (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: to analog as rcx is to programming plastic
|
|
(...) And now the more concise introductory perspective of weeks elapsed and a new age-nine-ish student/ parent pair to experiment with yesterday: Pricey, delicate, delightful: may require an engineer present to play without burning out parts. (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Editing Makefile (adding comman line arguements)
|
|
I am trying to edit Makefile in the main brickos dir so that I can access the arguements on the command line when I enter "make _____" to compile the directory. I need to do so because I need to have a certain command execute when the arguements are (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: My problems with adding a Best Fit algorithm for memory management to kernel/mm.c
|
|
(...) Yeah, very true. Those lines where in there becuase of the error I originally had in my code, but since my code changed (and is correct) those lines are not needed). Thanks Mike (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC's future
|
|
(...) I think you are the victim of too much snippage... :-) If you reread the original message, there is indeed mention of adding various Spybot related features but the "non-standard firmware support" was in reference to NQC in general. I assume (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: My problems with adding a Best Fit algorithm for memory management to kernel/mm.c
|
|
(...) BTW, you can delete these two lines of intialization (i.e. lines 12 & 15 in the above function) as the intialized value gets clobbered on finding the first suitable sized block: 12) mm_best_free=ptr; 15) mm_best_free++; //this must point to (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: My problems with adding a Best Fit algorithm for memory management to kernel/mm.c
|
|
(...) Sure thing sorry, the problem was that I had the wrong variable in one of the if statement, I copied it over wrong from my hand-written notes I made of the Alg ===...=== void *malloc(size_t size) { size_t *ptr,*next, bestSize, *mm_best_free; (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC's future
|
|
(...) All, I thought that the spybot could not have the firmware replaced. Am I wrong? -Andrea (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: My problems with adding a Best Fit algorithm for memory management to kernel/mm.c
|
|
(...) Fine. Could you please post the solution? I don't like unsolved riddles :) Regards, Michael (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete instructions for Linux?
|
|
(...) Rich, Those patches were created for optimizing some legOS code. I believe it was some interupt code. The legOS code and brickOS code have internal work arounds. I have some emails concerning this somewhere. But you don't need these patches (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete instructions for Linux?
|
|
From: Rich Warren <rikiwarren@mac.com> Subject: Re: Complete instructions for Linux? Date: December 5, 2003 6:57:12 PM MST To: nanobapt <nanobapt@wanadoo.fr> (...) Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that this would build the BrickOS (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: My problems with adding a Best Fit algorithm for memory management to kernel/mm.c
|
|
Nevermind, I figured out the error after I posted and reviewed my code again. Thanks anyway... (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | My problems with adding a Best Fit algorithm for memory management to kernel/mm.c
|
|
Well, my senior project is almost due (Monday) and I am having problems with one of the last algorithms to be added. My senior project is adding the 3 other algorithms to the memory management facitlity (mm.c), the algorithsm are best, worst, and (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Bump switches and "aggression"
|
|
"Russell C. Brown [RR-1]" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:001601c3baeb$9a...apophis... (...) ok :) you are right i was too touchy sorry the threshold's set no problem some of you guys said many great words to me that is precious! (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Bump switches and "aggression"
|
|
Just set the threshold on your pretentiometer to 50% and you won't hear that traffic anymore! Seriously, Pixel, you have been a cheerful contributor to this list for a couple of years now. You've had creative ideas that you've been most willing to (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Bump switches and "aggression"
|
|
(...) Creatures (animals and humans) do not scatter in a totally random direction. They scatter at a random vector in a direction opposite the source of whatever startled. That implies that more than one sense is being used to determine source (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
(...) Yes, I understand that you would have the downward pressure of the step move stop the leg movement by cutting off pressure to the piston(s) driving the foot down. Once this pressure is cut off by the switch, presumably the other legs continue (...) (22 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Bump switches and "aggression"
|
|
(...) Easy the bump switch jumps into a RNG, and it's important to understand that the output of a RNG does -not- need to be equi-probable, and it decides. Watch animals when they're startled, they don't stop and think, they jump around for a second (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
