 | | Re: Pneumatic Quadraped 242
|
|
(...) snip (...) I started working on articulated head and tail. Quad242 has a very large footprint, and walks inefficiently. One of the reasons for large feet is center of gravity. The center of gravity on Quad242 is just a little behind the center (...) (22 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build, lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGOTIC Hand
|
|
(...) Even more impressive now than the prototype I saw some time ago... Very clever use of Bionicle parts, would be a winner if a "Technic lame parts" contest was organized! XP to lugnet.robotics Philo (22 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
(...) Plenty of people have build eight legged walkers - that's not all that hard. However, the machine in WWW is supposedly very flexible and could climb near vertical cliff-faces, etc. You'd need at least two or three motors per leg to get that (...) (22 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
Or, provide suggestions on how to do it? I saw Wild Wild West the other day and was looking at the giant spider robot and wondered if making such a "sipder" robot is possible with lego robotics? Would it be possible? Has anyone done it? Does anyone (...) (22 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Opening COM port error
|
|
(...) Tyler, Happy to be of help! Regarding Garbage Collection, I'm not usually one to criticise without being able to suggest a better alternative. In this case, I think most GC systems could be improved by mimicking the concept of "smart pointers" (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "Non-Robolab" LabView functions
|
|
(...) Disagree. It's a matter of habitudes. Once you're familiar with the whole environment, you may write extremely complex programs without getting lost. For example, in our recent "Mars-mission" telerobotics project the complete programming -the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) They do work! But they are usually used with two quadrature outputs (hence the name), while on RCX only one wire is used and the 4 states are encoded as 4 voltages levels. (URL) (Image courtesy Michael Gasperi) The sequence (clockwise) is (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) The way I understand it, it's really not the sensor's fault. The RCX and firmware together either can't or doesn't deal with the ambiguous voltage levels sometimes returned during two of the four transitions. If the RCX were fast enough that (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
Could someone explain to me technically why this sort of of problem with the rotation sensor occurs? I know how quadrature shaft encoders are _supposed_ to work, and I can't see why this sort of thing should happen in the first place. >> Mark (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: "Non-Robolab" LabView functions
|
|
(...) Still waiting to hear from Dick about that. (...) I disagree that it's easier to understand and use. Possibly easier to learn or figure out without documentation, up to a point. But ease of learning is not the same as ease of use. Graphical (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Building a RCX™-compatible temperature sensor
|
|
An easy one, that has already be done numerous times... anyway, here is my implementation of a fully RCX-compatible temperature sensor, that provides correct values when used with standard RCX temperature routines. (2 URLs) RCX-compatible (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "Non-Robolab" LabView functions
|
|
(...) ---...--->snip I've not had the time yet to analyze the patch. Seems that you replace the first firmware handler. In Robolab the firmware is found under ..ROBOLAB\Engine\RCX1\Text. They simply have changed the extension .lgo to .txt and call (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | WTF: Broken RCX units
|
|
Anyone have or know where I can find broken RCX units for parts? Thanks, Rand (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Opening COM port error
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.java, Chris Phillips wrote: Hahaha, Your passionate condemnation of GC makes entertaining reading in light of the amount of work I have to do with lejos,Java,C++, etc for my final year undergraduate project. I will certainly (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) It took me some time to figure out why, but you are right, the ambiguous transitions occur only while counting up. What you could do though would be to count +1 while going from state3 to state2_ambiguous, and correct "phantom transition" by (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | math library
|
|
Hello all. About a year ago I researched math functions so I could write some for the RCX. I found some power series functions that work really well. I see another message here posted by "nanobapt" has also posted some functions so I tested his (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | "Non-Robolab" LabView functions
|
|
I've been experimenting with some of the LabView icons available in "Investigator" mode in Robolab (under the "hourglass" item on the outermost menu). They seem to cause some odd behavior sometimes. It seems like it's especially a problem if one of (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) Doesn't that mean that at any given count, you could still be off by 1, but now the odds of having an incorrect count are 50-50 instead of about one in 500? (...) There has been some discussion about whether this patch will work with Robolab, (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) If FIRST doesn't allow NQC - I can't see it allowing patched RCX firmware. ---...--- Steve Baker ---...--- HomeEmail: <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkEmail: <sjbaker@link.com> HomePage : (URL) : (4 URLs) GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GCS d-- s:+ a+ C++++$ (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
"Philippe Hurbain" <philohome@free.fr> wrote in message news:Hp4JAs.oK8@lugnet.com... (...) Much to my embarassment, I have to agree with Philippe that the patch doesn't work very well. I try to figure out what went wrong. (...) This is the expected (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
