 | | hovercraft
|
|
hi all now i think it's time to present you my application of as pure as possible lego hovercraft (URL) got 5 movies in mov format but my site is too small so if someone has some room for my movies... all of them have 19.3M the only one tricky point (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
"Jim Choate" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.33.0...ssz.com... (...) no comments man! i've been asking rhetotical :)))) i've got fun experimenting even if i know they lead to nowhere (...) what is with your sense of (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Suggestion: Provide precompiled Cygwin h8300 gcc+binutils, downloadable via Cygwin setup.
|
|
Compiling your own compiler is undoubtably the hardest barrier of entry to brickos. I suggest that the h8300 binutils and gcc be distributed as Cygwin packages from the brickos website. This would simplify the install to merely running Cygwin setup, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RCX Tank Base
|
|
I've finally posted pictures of my RCX Tank Base: (URL) of the RCX Tank Base One include: ==>Remote driving using the Ultimate Accessories remote. ==>Suspension using ten black spring mounts. ==>"Equal" forward driving using a 24 gear clutch and (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) We're not talking about hovercraft here at -all-. We -are- talking about the assertion that 'mass is equivalent to weight on the planet Earth'. It isn't, ever. A vector is -never- equivalent to a scalar, basic dimensional analysis; basic (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) And if we were talking about a hovercraft in an elevator - I'd be agreeing with you. Dumb pedantry doesn't work here. The **WEIGHT** of the hovercraft is just as important/relevent/applicable as the **MASS** of the hovercraft when we are (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) Ok, remember you asked... Let's take example 1- You're in an elevator. The elevator goes down. Your weight decreases but your mass does not. Q: Where did the weight go? Did you mass change? Example 2- Take a 1lb weight and a scale. Scenario a: (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) How? It seems to me that as long as acceleration due to gravity is constant (i.e. same altitude, same planet; in this case, 9.8 m/s/s) then weight and mass have a simple proportional relationship. (23 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) That's a pretty basic physics mistake <shrug>. -- ___...___ We don't see things as they are, ravage@ssz.com we see them as we are. www.ssz.com jchoate@open-forge.org Anais Nin www.open-forge.org ---...--- (23 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
|
(...) So long as we are down here on the surface of the earth talking about the air pressure under the skirt of a hovercraft and whether it'll lift or not, weight and mass are equivelent concepts. (...) Yes - I understand that. (...) Yes...although (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
