 | | Re: Jamocklaquat - Spine Segment 1
|
|
Ok, this may be a silly question but.....Jamocklaquat must be immensly heavy, how do you go about giving motors enough power to actually move elements such as the arms (from the shoulder) or the spine with the wieght of the body on it? I noticed a (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Please suggest which RIS version is good
|
|
I think you may be right about the software differences-- like I said, I've only used 2.0. Still, if you can get a good deal on an older version, grab it. Remember, you can upgrade to the 2.0 software for only $20 (search shop.lego.com for "2.0 (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Please suggest which RIS version is good
|
|
One should also consider their current/future computer system configuration. Windows 95: Older versions of Win95 do not support USB. Check (URL) for more details and how to determine if your version of Win95 and USB limitations. If your version (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Air Pressure sensor available.
|
|
Techno-stuff is pleased to announce a new Air Pressure sensor. The sensor is compatible with the Lego Mindstorms robotic system. It measures 0-200 KiloPascals (0-29 PSI) which matches typical usage of the Lego air system. The sensor is housed in a (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Please suggest which RIS version is good
|
|
Generall, I think they are all good. 2.0 software is somewhat improved (I haven't used the older versions, so I can't say precisely how much), and each kit includes slightly different pieces, but I think the differences are fairly minor. The one (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | brickOS & GNU Pascal (update)
|
|
If anyone is at all interested, I have a completed porting the brickOS headers to a set of Pascal units. At present, I have successfully written Pascal versions of essentially all the C and C++ demo files - including TrailerBot. I've also written a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Guidance, Advice, etc
|
|
(...) I'd say go for it. Ultimate Builders set has an extra motor, a touch sensor and some pneumatics, and the projects are also nice, though only on CD. Vision Command is a web cam with studs, and there are a few nice pieces in it. In leJOS people (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Jamocklaquat - Spine Segment 1
|
|
Hey all, I snapped some more gooder mo betta Jama-rama spine pix: Overall (URL) Loop'd-Loo - Mechanical Spine Cam Actuation - (URL) Eye Lights by John Barnes' hitechnicstuff.com (Thank You!!!) (URL) Duty Worm Table (URL) High RPM 9V Motors are (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with auto-steering mechanism.
|
|
(...) Ahhh. I see your point now. Independent of what the back wheels are doing, you still want a bias in the front wheel itself to go straight rather than spinning in place. Otherwise, all the power could just as easily spin the front wheel in (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with auto-steering mechanism.
|
|
(...) That's *not* entirely obvious. There is a tradeoff between ease of twisting of the turntable and ease of slippage in forward drive. A nice chunky tyre with tons of grip is hard to twist - which makes the robot drive forwards better without (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
