 | | Re: maximum number of variables in RCX2 ?
|
|
Hi John, (...) Yes ! Using more tasks you will get more local space (for each task 16). So maximum number of variables is 32+(16*10) = 192 (...) That's how NQC is handling memory for local variables in functions, subroutines, tasks. Local has a (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: maximum number of variables in RCX2 ?
|
|
(...) this (...) only (...) variables (...) the (...) From my understanding of NQC, the compiler automatically selects the most suitable location to store variables. Global variables are obviously always allocated in one of the 32 global storage (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Palm IR to RCX
|
|
(...) Thanks, it got much better in the meantime ... (...) I don't think it's possible to make the lib respond to requests from the rcx. The problem is, that this kind of reception of data requires 100% cpu time. Therefore, i can't continiously (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX Dead??
|
|
Hello Matthias, thanks for a very detailed description of your findings inside the RCX. I have just one comment to add ... (...) True, as long as we are talking Alkalines. But how about NiCd accumulators? I think they can deliver much higher current (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | maximum number of variables in RCX2 ?
|
|
When using the RCX2 target, the NQC manual (Section 2.2.4) states that 32 global variables, and 16 local variables (per task) are allowed. Does this mean that the whole program can only have 48 variables total when using only one task, ie. "main" , (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX Dead??
|
|
I saw your post on RTLToronto.... You didn't indicate whether you tried to use batteries again afterward. I'm assuming you did. I'm also assuming you hooked the terminals up backward. That could be trouble. The 7805 regulator will protect the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LIDARStation and LIDARDisp application finished
|
|
(...) I'm highly interested in seeing your results. The RCX obviously is not brainy enough to process and use the 3D data, but a host computer could be. I'd be interested in helping with the host software on a project like this. I've thought about (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: problems using firmdl3 and dll on Red Hat 6.2
|
|
(...) That file should just be a soft link to /etc/rc/init.d/gpm (or ../init.d/gpm), so there's no need to keep it. ROSCO (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Palm IR to RCX
|
|
Hi Till, Am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 19:31 schrieb Till Harbaum: (...) Do you think it is possible to implement the legOS network protocol for palmOS? Michael. (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LIDARStation and LIDARDisp application finished
|
|
(...) Not really. I believe this enough to try it soon. :) Two motors to turn and tilt the camera, and one for a differential drive setup(possibly using the reverse differential device). All the sensor ports would be used however - 1 for the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
