 | | RE: firmware
|
|
SDK 2 includes the latest version of firmware and tools to load it to the RCX. It's also included in the new RIS 2.0 CD The new RIS 2.0 is the one with the RCX 2.0 + USB InfraRed Tower + Latest firmware version (you could call it 2.0, yes) You can (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: firmware
|
|
this sdk 2 is the firmware??? -- Paula Berger E-mail: pberger@terra.com.br paula@inf.pucrs.br ICQ#: 71133278 "It's the end of something simple, and the beginning of everything else" -- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Seifert" (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: firmware
|
|
(...) Firmaware is a kind of ?operating system? needed to be downloaded to RCX to allow it process programs. Physically it is file firmxxxx.lgo (where xxxx is a number ) located somewhere in directory tree created by RIS installation process. If you (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Hacker rcx
|
|
Which command did you send and how did you send it? Did your RCX have the firmware in it? (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: newbie
|
|
If you decide to use LegOS you won't be needing nor will you have the chance to use NQC because a RCX with LegOS loaded won't understand nor respond to any standard firmware commands. Check (if you didn't already) the side links at: (URL) From: (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: newbie
|
|
so if i decide to use LegOS I don't need NQC, right? as I understood, de LegOS itself it's complete to be used alone.... (...) programs on RCX. (...) LEGO (...) could call (...) LEGO (...) standard LEGO (...) for (...) run some (...) don't (...) -- (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: newbie
|
|
LegOS is an operation system ( a firmware replacement in itself) It's like a mini UNIX system, that will run true C compiled programs on RCX. NQC on the other hand, all it does is translate a NQC program into LEGO pCode that will be *interpreted* by (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | newbie
|
|
Hi everybody, I'm starting to use Lego products and I'm having problems to undrestand a few things. For example, I want to use NQC and I don't understand why the LegOS needs a C cross-compiler... or by having LegOS I don't need NQC? -- Paula Berger (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: newbie
|
|
I'm not 100% sure, but when I used Spirit.OCX (VC, VB, Delphi, etc...) for some research, I was under the impression that it supported 3 types of interface: "Radio" (CyberMaster), "InfraRed" (RCX, Scout) and I think it was "Cable" or "Direct" or (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | firmware
|
|
People, What is this "firmware" that is supposed to be loaded into the RCX? Is there anywhere I can download it?? Thanks, -- Paula Berger E-mail: pberger@terra.com.br paula@inf.pucrs.br ICQ#: 71133278 (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: thread class for legOS
|
|
(...) Static DOES matter; it declares the method as being a "class" method, rather than a normal instance method. I believe there is no implicit 'this' parameter and therefore it can be treated like a normal function. Of course, it can't be linked (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Senshist.icb etc
|
|
hi john, the farnsworth stuff should work. did you download the zip file of programs from the HB site? there should be an as11_ic bat file in it. fred (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: thread class for legOS
|
|
(...) No, static doesn't matter but it is possible the calling conventions of C and C++ might be different (I don't know of a platform where that is the case for a an extern function), so you might need to specify C linkage, as in: extern "C" int (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: thread class for legOS
|
|
(...) Haven't done any C++ for a while, but IIRC you just need to declare runWrapper as static, ie: private: static int runWrapper(...) ; HTH ROSCO (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: threads - bug in the firmware?
|
|
(...) Advantage: Less memory used (each thread needs a block of memory in the kernel, I'm at work & can't remember the struct name off hand). In the case under discussion, this doesn't make much difference, but in a large project, memory use can (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Still having problems with helloworld.c
|
|
John, Where is the source for makelx ?? I am having this same problem. Thanks JohnG (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Handyboard Sonar question
|
|
I've been trying to connect my sonar module according to the instructions in the following webpage: (URL) However, Since I'm using an expansion board with my Handyboard, the SCI port isn't available. Also, my expansion board didn't come with a (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: Hacker rcx
|
|
(...) I'm not sure I understand what you need. The SDK is designed specifically to be used with applications like Visual Basic. Download it and you'll see what I mean. It even includes a sample VB program. Like Stef said, I think we need more (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Help with legos
|
|
All, I moved my Legos and Cygwin installations to a new machine. When I try and compile a program the compiler complains that there's a installation problem and it cannot execute 'cpp'. Can anyone givenme some insight as to what the problem is and (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Hacker rcx
|
|
hi, Maybe you could be a little more specific what your problems are, because: - sending data through the IR tower can simply be done by sending bytes to the COMport whereto the IR tower is connected - sending messages / direct and indirect commands (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
