Subject:
|
Re: thread class for legOS
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jan 2002 09:50:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2057 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, John A. Tamplin wrote:
> No, static doesn't matter but it is possible the calling conventions of C
> and C++ might be different (I don't know of a platform where that is the
> case for a an extern function), so you might need to specify C linkage,
> as in:
Static DOES matter; it declares the method as being a "class" method,
rather than a normal instance method. I believe there is no implicit
'this' parameter and therefore it can be treated like a normal function.
Of course, it can't be linked with any instance of the class, so you'd
have to treat it as a wrapper.
--
"From now on, we live in a world where man has walked on the moon.
And it's not a miracle, we just decided to go." -- Jim Lovell
Mike Ash - <http://www.mikeash.com/>, <mailto:mail@mikeash.com>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: thread class for legOS
|
| (...) Unless you define a function as a member function, there is no this parameter at all. In the example given, it was not a member function at all (nor should it be). I believe you are thinking of a static member function vs. a non-static member (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: thread class for legOS
|
| (...) No, static doesn't matter but it is possible the calling conventions of C and C++ might be different (I don't know of a platform where that is the case for a an extern function), so you might need to specify C linkage, as in: extern "C" int (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
