 | | Re: Resets
|
|
Actually, when I first tried the new motors, I was able to use them for a while. It wasn't until I went to download a different program that it started happening. That's what's confusing me. Is it possible that the L293D is burned or something like (...) (29 years ago, 18-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | RE: Motor control
|
|
Well if you believe in encapsulation it should be 0 to 100.0 %, then the implementation of the motor speed control could give its best effort in that regard. One of the things I hope to do on my Handyboard is set it up to run two of my PIC motor (...) (29 years ago, 18-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: Resets
|
|
(...) Well that would do it---it would discharge your battery. You actually should be getting more like 9.6 to 10v from a fully charged battery. Why don't you get an adatper that works and charge your battery until it's slightly warm and then see if (...) (29 years ago, 18-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | speed control encapsulation
|
|
(...) This is the reason I remember for encapsulating the value. It wouldn't be hard to implement new speed control for the 6811 either which could do better than 9 divisions. One option is to leave the encapuslated interface, but make more (...) (29 years ago, 18-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: Motor control
|
|
I like 0 to 8 better. Also is there any way to control the frequency at which the PWM works? I find that some of my motors deliver too much at step 1. How about if there was something like: motor( motornum, cycles_on, total_cyles); if you feed (...) (29 years ago, 18-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
