|
|
 | | Re: Motor control
|
| (...) Yes, and speed control is built in to the Interactive C motor function. motor(0, 100) turns on motor 0 at full speed; motor(0, 50) is half speed, etc. While we're on the topic, I am considering changing the speed argument, because in actuality (...) (29 years ago, 16-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | IC 3.1 with Win 3.1
|
| Has anyone tried running IC 3.1 for Win 95 on a win32s Windows 3.1 system? I njust tried it out, and the program complains of insufficient memory - on an 8 meg system, with no other applications running. Anyone have any idea what's wrong? (29 years ago, 16-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | strange IC files?
|
| I was just browsing the libs directory of IC 3.1 for Windoes, which I still havenb't been able to get working. I noticed, that at the beginning of every file, such as analogs.txt, there is the following message... inflating: libs/analogs.txt Low (...) (29 years ago, 16-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | IC 3.1 under Win 3.1
|
| (...) IC 3.1 certainly doesn't use that much memory! IC is a 32-bit application, which prevents running under vanilla Win 3.1, but it theoretically could/should work under win32s. We haven't yet tried it here (your feedback is the first we've (...) (29 years ago, 16-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Re: strange IC files?
|
| (...) I just double-checked and downloaded IC 3.1 for Windows from our site, and had no such problem de-archiving it. All the files were fine, and IC runs fine straight out of the zip, at least on a Windows 95 machine. Has anyone else seen this (...) (29 years ago, 16-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Re: strange IC files?
|
| (...) I've tried unarchiving the program a couple times, on a couple different machines, which had a couple different copies of IC, with the same results. I'll try it on the PC I have at home, which I haven't gotten around to doing yet. I'm also not (...) (29 years ago, 17-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Re: strange IC files?
|
| i think it would be good if beta users cc'ed their bugs along the handyboard list--I am interested in hearing how it's working but don't have time to bang on it directly. Perhaps others feel the same way. -Fred (29 years ago, 17-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | unarchiving problems w/IC 3.1 for Win 95
|
| I just tried unarchiving IC 3.1 on my 486 at home, running Win 3.1, and Win 32s 1.25.141.0 (or so the win32s.ini file says). I'm having the same problem I had before, where all of the files have an "Inflating: ...." message in front of them. My (...) (29 years ago, 17-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Motor speed table question
|
| Can anyone explain why the values in the _speed_table were chosen. int _speed_table[]= { 0b00000000, /* speed 0 */ 0b00010001, 0b01001001, 0b01010101, 0b01010111, 0b01110111, 0b01111111, 0b11111111 /* speed 7 */ }; Can they be change to a linear (...) (29 years ago, 17-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Re:Motor speed table question
|
| (...) Sure, why not? The way the motor speed table works is that the number is bit shifted out to the motor. Each bit gets the same ammount of time. So if you don't want your motor to move, then you bit shift all zeros. If you want it to run at a (...) (29 years ago, 17-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
