 | | Re: New mecha: Minotaur
|
|
(...) Thanks Bobby. I got Mavica FD87. I like it, but I still yearn for that manual focus. I haven't figured out how to best take extreme closeups yet. (people in .publish.photography, any help here?) (...) Yeah, this is a far cry from your usual 2 (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Photo Manipulation?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the info Hops! I had missed the link since I navigated to the group via the tree-view menu, which put me right in the sub-group, and thus passed by the root group of lugnet.publish -which is where the helpful links are shown on the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Dec-01, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Photo Manipulation?
|
|
(...) How is it that you end up posting in the correct newsgroup but do not see the link to this page: (URL) you are accessing this information via something other than the webpage, but the webpage has several links running down the left side of the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Dec-01, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Photo Manipulation?
|
|
Hey, Woo-hoo! I found the right newsgroup for my inquiries! And I see by looking around my questions on lighting and camera types have been discussed already. Thanks! One topic remains, which I do not see discussed formerly... Photo Manipulation. By (...) (24 years ago, 26-Dec-01, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera?
|
|
DEFINATELY get a macro lens camera. Your lego shots will be much better. I use one for all my Lego on eBay etc and believe me it makes a difference. Richard. "Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:sandlin-A3AB82....net.com... (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera?
|
|
(...) Not necessarily. Here's a Nikon you can afford: (URL) recommend it because it has a 1.6 inch focus range (i.e. you can get within 1.6 inches of the subject and retain focus) Good for photo'ing LEGO! :^) (...) Macro lets you focus when your (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera?
|
|
(...) that (...) I'd (...) ......... I'm in a similar predicament. "Which camera ?" "Other stuff" - well, maybe sometimes. * But it's important to me to be able to do some lego close-ups. Can someone point to some specific cameras (which have the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera?
|
|
(...) Definitely. It's also good to have one that takes good pictures in low light, since you want to avoid using a flash with lego. (Too shiny.) Check out (URL) for good digital camera reviews. (24 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Photography Techniques...
|
|
Well Geordan, Jordan needs help on this perplexing problem as well. =) (24 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera Q: Toshiba PDR-M61
|
|
"Shaun Sullivan" <Shaun_sullivan@irco.com> wrote in message news:GL3r2q.BEF@lugnet.com... (...) into (...) until (...) same, (...) law (...) Toshiba is (...) taken (...) Well, I don't know about the M61, but I'm now the proud owner of the M65. It's (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-01, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
