Subject:
|
Re: Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Sep 1999 18:26:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
513 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Amos Bieler <abielerMAPSON@netzero.net> writes:
> > Hey! I see a cookies.dat file in my user directory too. That's very
> > interesting. Hmm. Darn thing's binary (boo! hiss!) but anyway, as far
> > as I can tell, the cookies feature in Opera 3.60 is forgen borken. If
> > you know how to make 'em work, I'd love to know (so I can tell users how
> > if they ever ask). I've got "Enable Cookies" checked in the Advanced
> > Preferences dialog box, and yet it won't remember cookies on two
> > different pages that Navigator and Exploiter do just fine.
>
> What sites are these? I'll try them with mine.
I can't give out the URLs because they're private LUGNET-admin pages, but
one that you could test which uses the same cookie-storage code is this:
http://www.lugnet.com/news/post/setup/
My guess is: If a website named www.foo.com sends a cookie labled .foo.com,
that Opera mistakenly thinks it's a mismatch (it's not) and doesn't send the
cookie back to the server. (Again, this is just a guess.)
> > But it doesn't do <DL></DL>. :-(
> Mine does it just fine. How were these tags used?
http://www.lugnet.com/sitemap.cgi
> [...]
> Maybe you (or whomever the author was) didn't close a tag.
That was my first thought, so I ran the code through Imagiware's "Doctor
HTML" weblinter <http://www2.imagiware.com/RxHTML/> and then through W3's
validator <http://validator.w3.org/> and both parsed the <DL> lists
correctly. So I figured it must've just been some weird bug in Opera.
But now that you mention it, the <DT> tags aren't being closed explicitly.
Of course, <DT> tags (and many others such as <DD>, <TD>, <LI>, etc.) don't
need to be closed explicitly, so Opera has a bug in its HTML parser if it
requires that. It's possible that Opera is also confused by the existence
of <DT> without an accompanying <DD>, but it's more likely that the parser
is just broken a bit.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole)
|
| (...) Could you modify your cookies so that it used www.lugnet.com instead of .lugnet.com? So that at least _one_ site is compatible with Opera ;^) I'm getting pretty sick of typing my name/address in the web interface. (...) It seems to do unclosed (...) (25 years ago, 12-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole)
|
| (...) What sites are these? I'll try them with mine. (...) Mine does it just fine. How were these tags used? It passed this short test with flying black-on-grey: <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Definition List Test</TITLE></HEAD> <BODY> <DL> <DT>Spoon</DT> <DD>A (...) (25 years ago, 7-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
