To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 597
596  |  598
Subject: 
Re: URL characters
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.publish
Date: 
Sun, 18 Jul 1999 21:51:16 GMT
Viewed: 
4919 times
  
Todd Lehman wrote:

...the tilde character (ASCII code 126) isn't valid in URLs.  I've seen people
write %7E instead of ~, which is apparently the only correct way to write it,
but almost no one is aware of that (as judged by the huge number of ~'s seen
in URLs *everywhere* on the net).  So practically speaking, it would be more
broken (in users' minds) to disallow ~ than to allow it.

So what's up with that, anyway?  How the heck did ~ gain such huge popularity
if it's not officially allowed in URLs?  Was it allowed once upon a time?  Or
is it simply part of today's de facto URL standard because of its extremely
wide misuse?  (It's too bad that it's not officially allowed, because it's a
great character for what it's typically used for.)

--Todd

[followups set to lugnet.publish]

Unix makes the ~ character a users home directory ... so UnixSystem/~lee ... would
be my
home directory ...

Now because of this, and since the Internet (Arpanet) were all college schools when
it 'went public',  the system of choice at colleges was Unix, this made the web have
some of the same naming conventions ...

It's an old thing ... but you know what it's like to get hundreds of people to
change ... think of what the colleges went through to get millions of students to
change ... which they didn't.

-Lee.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: URL characters
 
(...) That's what I thought the etymology of ~ was in URLs too -- but how did it ever get *allowed* in URLs in the first place? That's what baffles me. The first time someone tried it, why didn't it fail? The early browsers and httpd daemons must've (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)

Message is in Reply To:
  URL characters
 
(...) Gulp, I made the same mistake in my URL detection code on the web interface here. Just tightened up the set of allowable characters a bit and regression tested...much better now. BTW, I'm consciously going against what W3 says about the ~ (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)

86 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR