Subject:
|
Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:18:06 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@io.%nospam%com
|
Viewed:
|
3302 times
|
| |
|
|
Robert Munafo wrote:
> Let me know what you think of the formatting. I think I got it right but I was
> really just copying what I saw in the other FAQ answers.
I haven't gone through all of them, but what I've seen so far has been
really good. Thanks again!
One issue (and this may be a non-issue) is the usage of <BLOCKQUOTE> -- has
there been a consensus on the list of usable HTML tags?
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com>
http://www.io.com/~jsproat
Darth Maul Lives
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Usable HTML tags
|
| (...) Thanks for pointing that out Jeremy. I had to guess on BLOCKQUOTE. I saw it referred to only in one place, the following suggestion by Todd Lehman: (URL) I assumed that it would be okay to use BLOCKQUOTE because there's no other easy way to do (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq
|
| Okay Jeremy, and anyone else who is interested -- I have now reformatted my FAQ answers and merged the content with the answers written by others and recently auto-reposted. I then tested the results for proper HTML formatting in my browser and then (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
86 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
