To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 1655
1654  |  1656
Subject: 
Re: URL characters
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.publish
Date: 
Thu, 2 Mar 2000 14:53:52 GMT
Reply-To: 
SGORE@SUPERONLINEstopspammers.COM
Viewed: 
9459 times
  
Anders Isaksson wrote:
> 
> 
> Sometimes I even think the French have done the right thing (for once) with
> their keyboards:
> 
> They have the upper row (with numbers and special characters) turned upside
> down, so you use Shift to get the digits, and all the special characters are
> reached unshifted! The numerical keyboard is always normal, so you have both
> digits and everything else without shifting (OTOH, they have swapped a few
> letters, just to make sure they differ from everybody else :-)
> 
> If you want a really different experience, you should try a Russian keyboard,
> with both Cyrillic characters, and our ones (but on completely different
> locations!)


We have two different keyboard configurations here, "q" and "f". In the
first one, letters are all located as a "qwerty" layout with a few
additions like ç ö ü and some others that you can't see if I type, and
almost all the special characters are located differently, and the other
one is the true national keyboard layout and strictly preferred by
10-finger typers. Since I'm not a 10-finger typer and I started using
computers with standard US layout keyboards my personal choice is "q"
layout, and I feel myself completely dumb when I face with an "f" layout
keyboard..:-) It looks so stupid when you can't type anything right and
typing so slow if you are supposed to be servicing this computer..:-)

Selçuk


> (Ah, the memories...)
> 
> --
> Anders Isaksson, Sweden
> BlockCAD:  http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
> Gallery:   http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery.htm



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: URL characters
 
Todd Lehman skrev i meddelandet ... (...) Agreed, but in my vocabulary 'clueless' rings harsher than 'chauvinist', am I totally out of line there? (...) I don't have all the messages in the thread left (and am off-line, as usual), but I'm sure my (...) (27 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish)

86 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR