 | | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Hey! I made that! It's called the (URL) Zolqwith I like this new feature! A great day in Lugnet History! Thank you Todd· Eric Sophie (...) (URL) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Of course, it make perfect sense now. Its Definately Bed Time Now The novelty will wear off right? -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) ROFL! Hey, I could've left Henry's mugshot up there, but I thought I'd try something a bit smaller. Now just imagine the confusion I could have caused by linking to the help pages. ;) (...) -Dave (who's done experimenting for the day) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) LOL, no... +X is what you'd have to write if you wanted to cajole a count-up list + into counting downward. If you just want a count-up list, you can use + without the X number, like this: + foo + bar + zot which results in: foo bar zot --Todd (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Aw, hey, man, don't do that...you're gonna make someone's brain melt. --Todd (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) I'm not a big fan of it either, but for the past 4-1/2 years, a proportional spaced font has been causing no end to headaches for people. The good news is that there are other fonts out there (for example Lucida Typewriter) that are easier to (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Maybe I am thinking of paypal where the first time you hit submit it takes you to the reveiw page to verify everthing then the submit button at the bottom actually lets you send your money. (...) Of course. I guess it is easier for people (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Uh, yeah! The uberposters would have to slow down to normal poster levels and wouldn't that be a drag. :) (...) I've got to congratulate you on the color subtleties as well. That's probably going to be the nicest feature as we continue to (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) I am not a fan of the fixed-width text. It looks like what we used to do in high school to meet that 3 page requirment for english reports when we only had a tad more than 2 pages typed ;) But seriously, IMHO it is harder to read, and kinda (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Automatically preview? How? Like you mean, when you press the Post button without Previewing first, it automatically previews? ;-) I think possibly the Post button should maybe be removed or grayed out at first (before you click Preview) to (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Yeah. Narf. Didn't it used to automatically do that? (...) I figured that out but thanks for the heads up anyway. The more I think about it, the more I think when used in moderation the new FTX tools will be very useful. I guess my initial (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) (*cough* *cough* always preview *cough* *cough* :-) You wrote a paragraph of type "-" (count-down list). There's only one item in the list, so it got the number one. --Todd (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) LOL... I'm sure the novelty will wear off after a while. --Todd (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Oops. didn't mean to double post. (...) Hey my name no longer has dash but a number 1 in front of it!? Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Oh man ====== I think this might wind up being abused. It's funny, earlier today I was trying to find a picture link for the new "Built to Rule" transformer line on one of the Transformer news groups and I was thinking how glad I was that Lugnet was (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Oh man ====== I think this might wind up being abused. It's funny, earlier today I was trying to find a picture link for the new "Built to Rule" transformer line on one of the Transformer news groups and I was thinking how glad I was that Lugnet was (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
I am very happy to announce three changes today to the LUGNET News web interface: Fixed-width font now used for plain-text messages. Once upon a time, when LUGNET first served up messages via the web, messages were displayed in a fixed-width font. (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: MOCpages is here -- Free web hosting for LEGO creations
|
|
(...) I think "first North American serial rights" is the usual phrase. It still reserves the right to the author to publish it again later, but it should be previously unpublished. This is one reason I won't submit to Bricks Magazine: they don't (...) (22 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: MOCpages is here -- Free web hosting for LEGO creations
|
|
(...) My understanding is that posting something to the web in ANY form constitutes publishing for the sake of this. Print publications will not pay full rates for previously-published material, if they accept it at all. If you're interested in (...) (22 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Update from Bricks Magazine
|
|
(...) Thanks! (...) I'm not sure yet, but that's a very good point. Give us some time and we'll try to find a solution for that. Once they're resolved, I believe we're going to send out a confirmation mail. I'm just not sure how we're handling (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
