 | | Re: Unviewable page, useless warning (Was: UCS TIE Crawler)
|
|
(...) I didn't go nuts investigating, but it looked like it preloads the images into Javascript objects, creates links around each image, then each link has an onmouseover/onmouseout that affects the contents of the image within the link. Meanwhile (...) (22 years ago, 16-Sep-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Unviewable page, useless warning (Was: UCS TIE Crawler)
|
|
(...) What does it do, anyway? (...) Nope. Nothing but a black b/g with a grey grid and grey stars. And the black-on-black <noscript> text that is visible only before the background image loads. Cheers, - jsproat (22 years ago, 16-Sep-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Unviewable page, useless warning (Was: UCS TIE Crawler)
|
|
(...) Wow. That's really wacky Javascript. I'm really rather amazed that Homestead makes such awfully complex Javascript for such an apparently small effect. But that's beside the point. I think you'll find that the code that's the problem is the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Sep-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Unviewable page, useless warning (Was: UCS TIE Crawler)
|
|
(...) *shrug* Until four things happen: (1) Javascript becomes less of a security/stability risk, and (2) ECMA officially becomes an integral part of the HTML standard, and (3) Microsoft and Mozilla and whoever else can agree on a common DOM, and (...) (22 years ago, 16-Sep-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Unviewable page, useless warning (Was: UCS TIE Crawler)
|
|
(...) Is Javascript even required? It seems to me that you could probably display the pictures without needing it. (...) Nope, sorry. I turn Javascript off by principle, especially when viewing websites on so-called free webservers. It really mucks (...) (22 years ago, 16-Sep-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
