 | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) I think they are going a little farther then necessary... I think simple "Report this content" buttons would be fine. Let everyone be a moderator. If the button is pressed the account or picture is held until it is checked. Dean (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) You diddn't read what I just wrote did you? There was no "arbitrariness", it simply was not obvious at first glance that it was on-topic. *Most uploads don't have that problem* because they obviously contain LEGO. I don't think it's fair to me (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Shot by the Sheriff K. Loch
|
|
I don't like the way "Moderation" on Brickshelf is being handled recently. Like probably 98% of all Brickshelf users I never uploaded anything offending, not even unneccessarily large images. Nevertheless, ANY new image I try to upload now is being (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
"Kevin Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in news:Gyt8H8.GHr@lugnet.com... (...) [...] (...) You didn't read the thread, did you? The picture is not deleted *ANYMORE*! I had to re-upload an updated version of it! It was then a few times toggled between (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) Yes, it is true. Do you mean the ad in this folder: (URL) doesn't look deleted to me. I don't see any reason why it would be (without complaint from a trademark/copyright holder). In fact, I remember looking at those pictures closely when they (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
