 | | Re: A question: Acceptable image sizes —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | (...) It depends on the purpose. - For printing I want ~2000x3000 pixel images (preferably not larger than 300kb). - For on-line viewing I want ~550x300 pixel images (60kb seems reasonable for this purpose). - Thumbnails should probably not be (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A question: Acceptable image sizes —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) But brief synopses would. For example, I cruised a site that wanted me to order from scanned images of a catalog. Links to each scanned page were provided. But no mention of the page contents were provided on the links page. So, to find what I (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A question: Acceptable image sizes —Richard Dee
|
| | | | | | On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 15:20:53 GMT, Steve Bliss uttered the following profundities... (...) Was thinking no thumbnails. Synopses definitely. Many a time, too have I had lost precious time waiting forever for something to download just enough to see if (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A question: Acceptable image sizes —Richard Dee
|
| | | | On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 12:54:00 GMT, Jacob Sparre Andersen uttered the following profundities... (...) Not likely! See my limited free web space disappear very quickly! (...) It would be just for that, and are currently 600x400ish, at 70-80kb. Any more (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
