 | | Re: Best way to write the registered trademark symbol in HTML? —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | (...) I looked it up. It's on position 8482 (decimal) in Unicode. Play well, Jacob PS: I was wrong about Netscape. The newest version handles both ™ and ™ as a trademark symbol. - But it is approximately three times larger than ® in the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Best way to write the registered trademark symbol in HTML? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Hey, awesome! I just tried ™ and ™ next to each other on a page, and they both worked on my system too. Since you know so much about this, can I ask another follow-up question?-- Is ™ "safer" (i.e., more likely to show up as (...) (26 years ago, 9-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Best way to write the registered trademark symbol in HTML? —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | (...) I just tried it on mine. P133/win95 in Netscape 3: the ™ is a small, raised TM the ™ is a ? question mark. in MSIE 3.02: the ™ is a small raised TM the ™ is a " quote character -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 9-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Best way to write the registered trademark symbol in HTML? —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | (...) I would expect ™ to be just as likely to work as ™ today. I expect ™ to be phased out sometime, but I don't know when (it might happen with NC5.0). (...) You can see the rendering of <P> T M ™ --- ™ T M<BR> <P> (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | ™ ™ and [tm] woes —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Oh, man, I see what you mean now. I can't believe how braindead Netscape 4.61 for RHLinux/Gnome is under the default install. Not having the actual tm symbol is one thing, but it actually converts it to a 4-byte character string!! :-( BLYECH! (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
