 | | Re: My mountain is basically done!
|
|
(...) After you've signed up... get into your name... then create a folder, and put the pics in it (click the 'upload' button). -Shiri XFUT .publish P.S. Kevin -- this isn't the first time that i've heard people wondering about how to upload. The (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.town, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling all LEGO City and Town webmasters!
|
|
Hi, My site has several LEGO town's/cities. It's called "Brad's LEGO Hobby" You will find the link here: (URL) Fortier <chrisfortier@iname.com> wrote in message news:Fx3nKL.Ms8@lugnet.com... (...) quality (...) be (...) site in (...) place (...) or (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.town, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling all LEGO City and Town webmasters!
|
|
(...) My site, (URL) , has a good bit of town on the LDraw Page, and I am about to add some more stuff. Alan (25 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.town, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Calling all LEGO City and Town webmasters!
|
|
Hello- My name is Chris Fortier and I am the new editor of the Open Directory Project's (dmoz.org) LEGO: Town category. I want to bring in as many quality LEGO City and Town sites into this directory as possible. I have been searching long and hard (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.town, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML question
|
|
(...) Image maps. These come in two forms, client side and server side. I personally enjoy server-side more, because it has the elemant of fun that results from not knowing where a click will lead, but that's not actually good from a UI design (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML question
|
|
(...) Well, lugnet.publish would be better... I'm following-up your message there... (sorry, all I know about HTML is that I have to use it for CW.) -Shiri (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-00, to lugnet.aquazone, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | POV Input
|
|
I've been playing aroung with POVRay over the last few days and was wanting to get some input. Check out the new picture on my Robots page. (URL) would also ask that people check out my Tracked Extraction Unit, TIE Fighter and the Sylph and let me (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
Frank, Just wanted to thank you for the insight on accessing functions in frame. That was the direction I needed. I was able call the function perfectly with the following syntax: document.frames("Ima...oomLevel); Also the look of the frame was (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
(...) [snipped a little] (...) Yup, that is basically it. Also fiddle a little with the iframe's style so it is not too obvious that the picture is inside a frame (no borders and no margins etc.)... I have used the 'function call in another (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
Your right Matt, I should have said Client side only, good call. jt (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
(...) Frank, I guess I should have worded the orginal question better, I didn't mean to say HTML only, but I think client side only would have been better worded. I realize that the current function isn't ASP. I should have been more clear, my bad. (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
(...) A small note about the scaling function you wrote; it isn't ASP, ASP is server side so if the user would press a button, the request has to do a trip to the server and back to make it's effect visible, the code you posted is typically client (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
(...) Your sample looks like javascript, not HTML-only at all. I'm not saying that to be bitchy -- just a suggestion that you might have better luck asking in javascript forums. (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
I've posted this question in few HTML news groups, so I figured I'd post it here to, there seem to be some pretty smart coders here on LUGNET. I'm working on a HTML only project (its a demo of a site) and I need to show an image viewer that has zoom (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital.
|
|
(...) You know, the 950 has a $100 rebate through the end of June. :) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: The Construction Site Boxcar...
|
|
(...) Eric, I've never been to that page so it can't be in my cache...and I have no problems seeing it with the following browsers: Communicator 4.73 (Mac8.6) Navigator 4.0 (Win98) MS Intermet Explorer 4.0 (Win98) Larry, I think the problem must be (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital.
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Yeah, I like the shot alot. I picked up my 2" mirrors at a Dollar Shop for 1$(can) each and 5$(can) for the 5"ers. Quick follow up note on the Macro issue; Take several Shots moving the Center Point for the AutoFocus each Time. I (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital.
|
|
(...) Nice photo's btw. Mirrors huh? Never though of that. Not sure I have any that will work. Your pictures are crystal clear. Well here's where bleaching (too much light) came out pretty cool... The Lego Seal team in the helicopter bay coming home (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital.
|
|
(...) Urp, re-reading what I wrote above, it doesn't sound like praise for the camera. Actually, in the cases that I'm not 100% satisfied with its quality, I'm usually about 90% to 95% satisfied with it. Drooling over some of the Nikon pix I've (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital.
|
|
(...) Maybe that's my problem with low-light situations! (...) That's awesome! Wow. --Todd (25 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
