 | | Lego found in animation tutorial
|
|
I was messing around learing to do animations when I found this: (URL) down to dynamic html and click on Monkeys in New York, isn't it cool that someone teaching you how to animated with dynamic html used legos in one of their exampples! Well it is (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.town, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish) !
|
| |
| | Re: Odd URL Thing
|
|
(...) I'm curious as well. Using default documents makes for more memorable URLs. (25 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Odd URL Thing
|
|
(...) Interesting... I was just wondering what the issues were that made switch away from index.html? I rely heavily on index.html in the sites that I manage. My general practice is to only have one HTML file per directory that is always index.html. (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Odd URL Thing
|
|
(...) Interestingly, because of various issues, in my own web pages, I've started to rely less on index.html and instead having a specific page within a directory. I then make index.html auto-redirect to the correct page. One thing this means is (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Whoa! Something must have happened!
|
|
I checked my counter reports today, and I had a... believe it or not, 18 hits! On a page that usually gets one hit a day! Something must have happened! And it's not the same person reloading over and over, I can see how many times a person has (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
|
Aw, heck. I got that decimal in the wrong place again. I'll send you your $.01 soon. ;^) Thanks for the pics. ~Mark (...) them (...) post to (...) $250) has a (...) mode (fixed (...) My (...) soft, (...) no (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
|
(...) Especially see (URL) some of the better close up work I have done with this camera. Will (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
|
(...) Can I get in on that bet? My Kodak DC215 (a fairly cheap camera, obtainable now for under $250) has a macro mode that lets you focus as close as 8". The regular focus mode (fixed focus) is no slouch either, working from about half a meter to (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera
|
|
Unfortunately, there is no option for "takes good closeups." Many (usually cheaper) digital cameras cannot focus any closer than about 2.5-3 feet. I went through the options and it recommended a whole bunch of bargain-basement cameras, but I'll bet (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera
|
|
(...) <clip> (...) Wow, I'm surprised that these were taken with an ePhoto 1280. I had this exact camera but sold it because I could not get adequate close-ups. Also the flash was positioned poorly for close-ups and always cast horrible shadows and (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Upcoming Web Site
|
|
Hi All, I am working on a new web site that will feature a LEGO Buy-Sell-Trade section, a LEGO Clubs-fans web page links section and custom models and idea books for sale. The idea books are what I need advice on? I plan on drawing step by step (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scan Quality
|
|
The moire is most likely to disappear at 300dpi. If this is on a dedicated scanning computer, I'd be very surprised if it had no provisions for reducing moire. Since disk space isn't a concern, 300dpi will probably do you pretty well. Oh, another (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: XFUTs (Was Re: Digital Camera)
|
|
(...) Well, if it's something you're interested, that shouldn't be too big of a burden. (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | XFUTs (Was Re: Digital Camera)
|
|
Shiri Dori wrote in message ... (...) where (...) only (...) Yes, well please keep in mind that setting follow ups to groups that people don't normally read can be annoying for people not using the web interface... so now I'm going to have to (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: What color is this?
|
|
(...) Whoah! that sounds like a challenge. good luck :-) (...) Yes. and that's a tricky one because of things like Fabuland. Some colors were there first. For someone like me, I only see them in catalog pictures (at best). help will be needed for (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.publish, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera
|
|
(...) I don't think she called you annoying -- she said it can get annoying when something is excessively cross-posted. In fact, posting things to the right group is a basic point of netiquette. [Followup to .off-topic.debate, as the previous post (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What color is this?
|
|
(...) Maybe I'll try it over the weekend. I may even do a bit of associated detective work to find the part which is available in the most different colors. I hopefully can get good pictures. I have a slave flash which I have made good use of with (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.publish, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera
|
|
(...) Oh, it was just a sarcastic response. Re-read your post. I felt my toes were just a -little- bit stepped-on when you called my posts "annoying." Next time you suggest someone move to a different topic, just leave the part where you call them (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera
|
|
(...) Hey, I wasn't trying to police or anything of the sort. I was just trying to be helpful, sorry you don't view it that way. I guess I shouldn't try to help and direct people to places where they might find help - excuse me. -Shiri (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Digital Camera
|
|
Oh sure, because NOBODY in .space or .castle takes pictures of their MOCs, so I'm sure they would be totally uninterested in digital cameras. Actually posting here was -quite- helpful. I got an answer and have located a camera on eBay that will suit (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
