| | Re: stupid question
|
|
(...) That's odd. Mine shows the baffling icons *and* the text...hmmm. LFB. (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: stupid question
|
|
The buttons are smaller as icons and I need the real estate. Or so I claim. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | A little more info on McDonald's sets
|
|
Ok. I did a little badmouthing of McD's before, so I'm posting this partially as penance. I went by McD's a few days ago (Saturday, to be specific) and went about the task of attempting to buy some of the sets. I noted that this McD's (which is not (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: stupid question
|
|
(...) Kevin, you're a geek after my own heart. The very first thing I do with any new Netscape profile is turn the buttons into text. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds Info
|
|
(...) 'Piece Out of Other Pieces', ie, a single part which should have been several pieces. Anything from a 5-high brick to a BURP (Big Ugly Rock Piece) to a Town Jr helicopter landing skid. A related term is SPUD-Single Purpose, Useless, (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: stupid question
|
|
(...) I looked at my Netscape bar and wondered why it ddn't look like what Larry said... and realised it's because I have it set to text instead of icons. Mine says intuitive things like "New Msg" and "Reply" instead of showing baffling icons :) (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonald's Happy Meals Sets -- modified parts
|
|
(...) I just assembled Set #2 and looked closely at the slope. The printing is some kind of transfer, not the usual LEGO printing. I suspect the smooth slope was designed to be a useable surface for these transfers. This will probably set a trend (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McD set numbers
|
|
I got a couple of #2s yesterday. Like #1 there is no prominent set numbering on the front or back. The tiny number on the bottom of the back is '2069/4125055'. Ray (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | McD set numbers [DAT]
|
|
From the scans at the McD site mentioned here, I believe the set numbers are as follows: 1 2032 2 2065 ? 3 2075 ? 4 ? 5 2045 6 2047 7 1845 8 2025 Can anyone confirm this/fill in the blanks? Thanks Huw (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: stupid question
|
|
Weren't you the guy who told us you were a "professional" web designer? Maybe I'm misremembering but... Anyone who's a pro at the web like you told us you were ought to know the basics of using a newsreader. Starting a new thread is newsreader (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: Mc Donalds Duplo
|
|
Some McDs don't even have this set, they tried to give me an older toy instead. One store told me this was the set going out in all the happy meals. Oh Well ! Ray (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.duplo, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: stupid question
|
|
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Mike Stanley (<slrn81t0pg.s4.cjc@....utk.edu>) wrote at 05:08:34 (...) Not to me. I rather thought there were many groups here on Lugnet so that people could tune in to their specific interest. Jon has tried to make an on topic (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: more on McDonalds promo sets
|
|
You know, it's interesting that I see at least 2 sellers, both from SoCal, that say they have 50 or more complete sets. I wonder if someone is buying/bribing/stealing them from a distribution point down there? I hope one of you manages to find out, (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: instruction scans on McDonald's web site
|
|
Hmm, this definately throws a new variable into the mix! It looks like it's even an official LEGO page, since the red logo appears the page. Remember what I said about an official page having to be "perfect"? KL (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: stupid question
|
|
(...) My bad, I just saw all the "reference" headers. Feh. Here's one more! (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: stupid question
|
|
(...) ...and even more so because he's actually posting a new thread to ask how to post a new thread, rather silly when you stop to think about it. D'oh! LFB. (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | How to Post (was: "stupid question")
|
|
(...) To be fair, the original question should be answered here for the record. You must "drill down" to a specific newsgroup in order to post. (Choose from the list of links at the top of the page.) Once you are down in the hierarchy at least one (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: stupid question
|
|
(...) Especially since he's asking how to post a new thread here that he apparently doesn't intend to follow...? (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: stupid question
|
|
(...) Wow, that's violating one of the core rules of behaviour for discussion groups. Here's what it sounds like to us: Hey, I can't figure this out, so I want one of you people to help me. Oh, but don't post it here, because my time is too valuable (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | stupid question
|
|
this is a very stupid question but how do i post a new thread? please email me at orbitalstarcraft@hotmail.com because I don't check this newsgroup. thanks - Jon (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.promo)
|