 | | Re: The next lego legend —Jackie Tang
|
| | | Damn, I just checked out from the catalogue and noted that I made a mistake at the outset and throughout in our discussions. The one I have and which I said I personally prefer it to 6286 is 6289, which was re-released by Lego.com and is the only (...) (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The next lego legend —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) Since it exists elsewhere - whoa, way back as Pirates message 315, you can read my rankings (and undoubtedly others if you follow the thread). (URL) (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The next lego legend —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) (URL) also in reply to Bruce's post mentioned above), but my website has a more recent ranking. Frank (22 years ago, 31-May-02, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The next lego legend —Tom Reed
|
| | | | (...) I would rank them this way: (1) 6286, (2) 6285 (3) 6289. The 6289 was my first large ship to purchase. I can understand why you might prefer it at the moment. Wait until you build your first 6286 or 6285! Those are great models to put (...) (22 years ago, 31-May-02, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | |
