|
|
 | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
| (...) Hmmm...you've got a point there...I guess It's an issue of both of the topics above, one being 'how many members would remain', and the other being the 'membership price'. I don't think an annual fee would be bad. I could easily afford $25 a (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
| Scott A <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:Gsv03y.HtD@lugnet.com... (...) leadership (...) be a (...) members (...) to (...) Hi Scott, Add me to the list of those wondering the same thing. -- Jason King LugNet #665 (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
| (...) I think many of us agree. So why aren't we paying? In my case, I just keep meaning to. I bet there's a lot of that. (...) It would. But $25 per year is something that _any_ North American teen who is well off enough to enjoy LEGO and computer (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
| (...) I wonder what the subscription fee would be if we wanted to pay somebody to run this show FT? What would the "going rate" be if an individual from the USA was employed? I really doubt 1500*$25 ($37500) would be enough? Scott A =+= Have you (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
| (...) Personally, I think that the notion that a major message board can remain friendly is naïve at best. A "message board" like LUGNET is the juxtaposition of people of many cultures, ages, interests, as well as different levels of experience with (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
|
