|
|
 | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
| You are right Chris a higher membership fee would probably help Lugnet in someway. And I would be more than happy to pay. The enjoyment i get from LUGNET is definately worth it.. However some of our members are still teenagers and they might not be (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Revelant? To what? To whom? You? (...) My concern is with your post. So somebody highlighted it? So what? Why do you feel as if you need to somehow micro-manage behavior on LUGNET? You probably would have had a coronary a while back when folks (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Funny, very funny. Isn't it against the TOS to throw in nasty comments. (...) Fine. Be as negative as you want. There's no need to add more negativity to Lugnet as it is. Use your time more wisely. I, for instance don't spend 10 out of 11 (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: A Request
|
| (...) Why? If you don't mind me asking... (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | LUGNET's Good Health was: [Re: Lugnet's tailspin]
|
| note: I happened to pick this post of the thread to respond to, for no better reason than it just came up on my ticker. As for some people calling this 'a tailspin', well, even if I were to agree (which I don't), you'd better keep in mind that this (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
|
