|
|
 | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| Interesting how you presume to talk on his behalf… And all the others who posted… Anyway… (...) That's all well and good. For you can e-mail him as much as you want, you can leave as many happy-goodbye messages in the .peoples section as you wish, (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) As someone who HAS taken a break I can say that it can be quite a good thing, in that it recharges your batteries a bit. It can also remind you that LUGNET is more than just one person, even yourself, because the discussion goes on without you (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| I hope that is all it is, I would rather he just take a break than sour over time. (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Definitely. What is happening to Lugnet anyway? (...) Hmm...The community should really think about this. What exactly Is Lugnet and why was it instated? I'll tell you. Lugnet is the medium for Lego fans like you and me to discuss matters (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | | | | RE: On Hiatus
|
| (...) IMO, the problem is that people seem to think the noise is more important than the content. To me, the content on LUGNET is the MOCs and the related building discussion. Noise is people bickering about why they can't get along...which leads to (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Jim, I know Tim well enough to say that it is not the name change that brought him to this decision, it was just the last straw of a long complex chain of events. It isn't that he can't handle negativity or criticism. It is that over a long (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| If this is about the name change , it is best that you do take a break. While I feel it was a little out of line for you to ask,(if that indeed is what this is all about) you did it in the nicest possible way. It also got blown out of proportion by (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| I'll admit I'm feeling like some others here do. Tim has always played an important role here on Lugnet but, a partial quote, "Lugnet is a somewhat compartamentalized RTL". There are still times when I find it worth posting something (like the (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) I think it is a case of why he is leaving that got it highlighted not so much that he is leaving. Tim was a great advocate for LUGNET and it is very disturbing that he feels he has to walk away for a while. (...) It does to some of us who have (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| What a waste. To highlight a post about someone's hiatus?!? He said he’d be back… Anyway, like it matterz Can we stick to more relevant topics for highlighting in the future? . .. ... .... ..... ...... ....... ........ Spydèr ........ ...... ..... (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
|
