To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.peopleOpen lugnet.people in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 People / *5147 (-10)
  Re: E: A Retrospective
 
(...) To quote Anders: "Stupid question: In whatever way will that post help?" (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)  
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
(...) I see nothing inconsistent here. Eric should get an indefinite timeout until he requests cancels on the posts that clearly are over the line, acknowledges he erred and that the ToS does apply to him, and apologises for causing part of the (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people) ! 
 
  E: A Retrospective
 
Now that Lugnet's resident "tortured artiste" has gone, leave behine a whiff of prescribed substances and stale sweat, I'd like to share our memories of this somewhat talented, and amusingly unstable individual. Mine would have to be (URL) - nothing (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
(...) I'm fairly sure Eric might try to off himself if his posting privileges were permanently revoked. Dunno if that's the reason Larry is suggesting softer treatment for a greater offense, but it's something to consider. Soren (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people)  
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
(...) Hmmm, interesting to compare that view of Eric, who has shown a wilful disregard for the ToS, with (URL) your opinion of Jojo>. (...) That would involve someone deciding what "completely inappropriate" is. But as you brought it up, which posts (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)  
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
(...) Me for one. It was deserved but I sincerely hope this is a timeout, to be lifted when Eric apologises and indicates he understands that he needs to comply with the ToS, and will do so, and not a permanent loss. Further, and just as (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)  
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
(...) Thank you for this Suz (and Todd?). I realise that it must have been a hard decision to make but I feel it was the right one under the circumstances. Tim To Eric, When I first posted in response to you my only intention was to get you to admit (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE not IM related
 
(URL) sorry about that>> (19 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.people.support, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
 
(...) I see no such implication in anything Dave wrote here. (...) Huh? Not that I have anything against elitism, but LUGNET doesn't seem to even have any mechanisms for an elite, aside from background stuff (whether or not a set is put in the (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.people)
 
  Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
 
(...) Well I think (URL) this> comes pretty close, but I suppose that's subjective. ROSCO (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR