 | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) The list used incorrect values for 2001, se a new and improved list here (moved to new thread for convinience): (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | 2002 Rocket list!
|
|
Hi all! I've made a list of the 2002 rockets, that is, the people that increased their posting the most. I used Dan's list of how many posts each person did in 2001 & 2002 and calculated the difference. To keep this post a little shorter (and my (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) Oops, my mistake. Since I know I posted more than 1 message in 2001 I didn't twig that the first numerical column wasn't the difference!. (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) Yes, it has been pointed out to me Dan posted two versions of the 2001 list and I used the incorrect one. I'll see if I can rework the whole thing later today or in the weekend. Best, /Tobbe (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) I think you may have a problem with your information for 2001. I posted more than 19 times and I am pretty sure Larry posted more than the 225 times you reported for him. Jude (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) ... (...) ... (...) ... Tobbe, I'm not as big a rocket as you might suggest. I think that you may have used the wrong list from 2001. As I recall, Dan Boger posted two lists; the first one was incorrect. correct 2001 list (URL) Clark 193 (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) I'm not quite sure I follow you, but as I did the list I found _a_lot_ of people that either did not post at all or only a few posts in 2001 that had a fair amount of posts in 2002. Of course I took away everyone who posted less then 50 times (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) Mine too - I got 147 posts, and I only ever post using Outlook Express! Go Microsoft!!! (j/k) ;-) Cheers, Paul (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) What I find most bizarre is how consistent the majority of posters are, the number of us who are within 0 or 1 of last years total is freakish. I imagine this is mostly down to the amount of time we each have to surf Lugnet. Psi (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) As a matter of fact I myself thought I'd be a good rocket (went from two posts to 21st place) and before I fell asleep last nigth I thought it would be cool to make a list with the biggest rockets from 2002. So I made that. Due to the fact I (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting frequency?
|
|
(...) then ancient history quietly disappears from view. Kerry (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Mine is LEGOFAN (CA) (Re: an other LEGOMAN plate)
|
|
(...) Guess so! (...) I should get it in a couple of weeks, I think. How long did it take you? Did you order yours off the web? (...) Good idea. I'm planning to be there - but I might not bring that car. --Bill. (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
Wow. I jumped from being tied for last last year (with 1 post) (I'd just gotten my membership), to 20th this year (with 592 posts). With that rate of growth, I'll squash Larry's numbers by Ground Hog's Day. Happy New Year's, all. Bruce Hietbrink (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) Thanks so much, I'll try this next time! I really appreciate yours and Tobbe’s assistance…I was beginning to think that nobody would help. Obliged, --==Richard==-- (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) Thanks for the help Tobbe! I liked it when you wrote: Mr. #21 (is it jus’ me or does this sound really Japanese) <Mista numba twenty-onee> ;p Your fellow compatriot Mr. #31! --==Richard==-- (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) If you don't want to delete all the quoted message, but just the list (or any other time you're trying to delete stuff en masse), just put the cursor at the start of the first line-to-be-deleted, hold down shift, and tap (or hold) page down (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) Woo hoo, #698! (just thought I'd offer a slightly larger number than most who have replied). Then again, I only started posted a couple months ago. -Greg "Fox" Cook (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
(...) In Windoze, click in the textfield then press [Ctrl] + [A], that is the default Select All keyboard command. Best Mr. #21 (remove SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting frequency?
|
|
(...) Indeed there are. The real fun comes when you start treating the first two as the third. (Not to be confused with treating the third as either of the first two of course :-) ). I think that this thread must be the longest (chronologically) on (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting frequency?
|
|
I think what we can safely conclude from this thread is that: 1) there are lies, damned lies and statistics (I apparently have posted 287, 321 or 481 times in 2002) 2) no matter how you caculate it, Larry posted most :-) 3) people need to learn to (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
|
