 | | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) I *think* that "knobs" may be more common in the U.K. but I could be very wrong. It would be interesting to hear from someone who uses the term (if anyone) and know where they are. I know at least one reference to it, and it was one made by (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) And from my perspective, if I heard the word 'lug' I would think of a 'lug nut' and studs don't really remind me of those. But it's interesting to hear that someone does, indeed, use a term like that. This is what makes this topic so much fun. (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) I found those elements to be difficult to label. I'm not sure 'bevel' is perfect, but then neither is wedge. ;) Had I known about 'skew' I just might have tried to resurrect that term. I quite like it. (...) I think slope bricks are actually (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
I think a few of us have our own terms. I have heard the studs referred to as "lugs" as well, although I did have to explain to someone that it was not reason Lugnet is so named. How about Technic Beams vs Technic Bricks. I admit to never having (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) Interesting. To me, 'bevel' would apply to slope bricks more than wedge/skew bricks. Actually, it seems like a very good term for slope bricks. Hmm, excuse me, I need to go update some LDraw part names... ;) (...) I'm always up for part-name (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) Ha. It is single, but obviously not concave. The "double concave" could be more clearly written "double, concave" or "double & concave". But I'm sure you knew that. DFTT, etc., etc. A truly double-concave part would be interesting -- only two (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) Definitely studs, as even french people use, not mainly but only, this term. (...) AZMEP plates :) (...) Erling bricks :) (...) If you talk about System plates, I've read "one third brick" from a LEGO book. If you talk about Duplo plates you (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) In the Brickopedia I got away from those two terms, since I agree with you... they can be confusing at times. :) For example, I called this: (URL) an 'Outer Corner' as in the way it's sometimes used to create the outer corner or edge of a (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) I always had a problem with "convex" and "concave" (and, of course, their "doubled" bretheren). I've always associated those words with curved parts. But I can't really think of a better way to describe them.. Darrell (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) Part names. One of my favorite topics. :) While I was working on the (URL) for my book I spent a lot of time thinking about part naming and categorization. (...) I don't know that I'd label that name as "ridiculous". It may be outdated(1), but (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A familiar uniform on a minifig MOC
|
|
Hi Adrian (...) It is an extraordinaryily useful substance, isn't it? :) If you haven't seem my discussion on making custom elements, have a look here for lots more techniques and suchlike: (URL) When painting that small, do you use stencils or (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.parts.custom, lugnet.parts.mod, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: A familiar uniform on a minifig MOC
|
|
Excellent work! I've never thought of using epoxy putty to build up a custom lego element, but it seems perfectly suited to the job - I do use it for all sorts of other household repairs. Love that stuff. When painting that small, do you use (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.parts.custom, lugnet.parts.mod, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: A familiar uniform on a minifig MOC
|
|
(...) Thanks for saying. :) I've had a lot of inspiration and education from various online sources over the years, and this sort of thing is my way of trying to put a little bit of value back in circulation. It's also an attempt to provide a bit of (...) (20 years ago, 10-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts.custom, lugnet.parts.mod)
|
| |
| | Re: Chirality
|
|
(...) Well, if you want to show the lone pair of electrons you could. (URL) is a link to a pdf. I didn't think that sending you a 385 kB e-mail message was sucha great idea:) I thought the model was a neat idea. Unfortunately, one of the reviewers (...) (20 years ago, 10-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.parts, lugnet.edu)
|
| |
| | Re: Chirality
|
|
(...) Excellent Chris, what did you use for the bonds and what did you use for the atoms. And were you also able to show double covalent bonds. (which is something that would be hard to show) I would love to read the article if you want. I get so (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.parts, lugnet.edu)
|
| |
| | Re: Chirality
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Actually, you can model Lewis Structures* with LEGO too. I sent an article describing the LEGO-Lewis Model to the Journal of Chemical Education, but they rejected it :( A reviewer suggested that I re-write the "article" as an (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.parts, lugnet.edu)
|
| |
| | Re: Chirality
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Nah, you don't have to use a new piece (URL) [1] Chris 1. (URL) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Chirality
|
|
(...) And we would call them what..... Yes! Diastereomers :) (...) not to the pedantic (...) Chris (20 years ago, 9-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: A familiar uniform on a minifig MOC
|
|
Hi Norbert, Thanks for posting this! Although I've only been modeling digitally lately, I really enjoy your tutorials. Question re: hat production Have you ever thought of just making a silicone mold out of the finished prototype? Then you could (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts.custom, lugnet.parts.mod)
|
| |
| | Re: Chirality
|
|
Hey, Awesome post! Larry has a point with the text on the studs, but when I teach symmetry and chirality and talk about everyday objects I always put in the caveat "this baseball has such-and-such symmetry properties, igoring all imperfections and (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
