Subject:
|
Re: Meeting in March?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.richlug
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:26:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1465 times
|
| |
|
|
I think a meeting on the 31st is our best bet. I think we will have a
better turn out and will give us a little more time. I don't know how
quickly the library needs a answer about this display, but I will find out.
I think one way or another we need to spend an hour or so in our meeting
confirming our intentions in future events this year. We have plenty of
time to discuss and plan for these summer events. I think we also need to
continue to look at some more local events for us. I also think that Lego
community events are important and as a LUG we need to participate in some
of these upcoming events. I know their will be some train shows and other
things that WAMALUG is going to be participating in and holding even. I
definitely think a visit up there way is in store for us. Brickfest will be
a good way to keep lego community ties up and working also.
Well I don't want to restate the obvious anymore.
If everyone is ok with the 31st I will reserve the room and call the meeting
schedule final.
Anyone with objections?
In lugnet.org.us.richlug, Greg Perry writes:
> In lugnet.org.us.richlug, Timothy D. Freshly writes:
> >
> > I know that Jon said he can't make the 17th (he is leaving on a trip the
> > next day) but I do not recall anyone else being unavailable that day. Like
> > Rich, I am not available on the 23rd, so if we are going to do a Saturday
> > meeting, I can only make this Saturday (the 17th) or the 31st.
> >
> > I'm all for this Saturday (the 17th). Maybe we should think about a bit
> > shorter meeting and maybe a group lunch somewhere (Topeka's is close by).
> > If there is not enough time for people to build a whole lot by then, maybe
> > we can use the meeting to handle more mundane matters (discuss upcoming
> > plans, displays, ideas, etc.).
> >
> > Tim
>
> I'm still open to either date (17th or 31st) - I agree with Tim about the
> idea of a shorter meeting with maybe a focus more on organizing than
> building, etc. - especially if we do go ahead and get something together for
> the 17th. Then folks wouldn't have to worry so much about getting stuff
> ready for a "big" meet in just a few days.
>
> If we do delay until the 31st then I think maybe a longer meeting might be
> in order since (by my own rambling logic) that would mean we have more time
> to plan, etc.
>
> For either meeting I'm still willing to bring some video and a vcr if Chris
> can lug along the monitor. Also I have my videos on cd-rom in mpg format so
> if anyone has a laptop with Media Player or Quicktime on it we could always
> check them out that way too.
>
> G.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Meeting in March?
|
| "Rich Schoonover" <rwschoonover@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:GA4t0n.Mw4@lugnet.com... (...) out. (...) be (...) meeting (...) None here. Let's go for the 31st. (plus this way there is no conflict with March Madness - This weekend I will be (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.us.richlug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Meeting in March?
|
| (...) I'm still open to either date (17th or 31st) - I agree with Tim about the idea of a shorter meeting with maybe a focus more on organizing than building, etc. - especially if we do go ahead and get something together for the 17th. Then folks (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.us.richlug)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
