| |
In lugnet.trains, Chris Phillips writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Chris Phillips writes:
> > In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > Is there a photo that clearly shows the sensor in a fairly tight closeup so
> > > that it can be judged how obtrusive/invisible it is? I skimmed through many
> > > of the photos posted by you, Dave, and Tim but did not see one, although I
> > > may have missed it...
> >
> > I just looked through my pictures and I was surprised to find that I don't
> > have any that show the sensor. I will snap a few close-ups tonight...
>
> I took a few close-ups of the sensor last night, and uploaded them to
> BrickShelf. Check out:
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2264
>
> The first picture is the sensor itself with a few "common" objects nearby
> for scale. The second picture is my reproduction of the exact setup that we
> used the sensor in for the train show last weekend. The third picture shows
> a better enclosure that I built around the sensor last night, using a 1x2
> plate, a 1x4 plate, and a pair of 2x2 tiles, all in dark grey. (You should
> be able to discern the construction details of this enclosure from the
> picture.) The enclosure serves two purposes: (1) hide the offending
> non-LEGO component and butchered cable, and (2) protect the sensor from
> getting snagged in the undercarriage of a passing train.
Chris, I was just wondering if there was a decline in performance in the
enclosure as opposed to outside of it. The enclosure looks great!
Eric Kingsley
The New England LEGO Users Group
http://www.nelug.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
