 | | More medieval village
|
|
Just to get people's interest up for the benefit event, and to show some things I've been talking about, I've posted a few pics of my newest medieval stuff to Brickshelf. Quality is terrible because I used the only camera available to me, the Lego (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
|
(...) 16 bricks? Shoot, this could be a little tight for my Amtrak Superliner... Not to mention the dinosaur transport car. I think both of those end up being 14 high (counting wheels) so we should be OK, if people even want to run these... Peter (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) I don't think we'd have a real problem with a policy like this. If you look at out January display, we filled--what was it, 18x24?--a layout and had very few stock buildings. Lots of stock cars and train parts, but really not that many stock (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
|
(...) Amy I moved the road over.I had a enough room between big red and your white building to slide things to the left. (...) Ok i moved the monorail.Keep in mind the track(mono) sits on 16 bricks then the track itself(to keep clear for the RR (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
Frank, (...) Well, you don't really know the situation, and some other items involved with this, but anyway... (...) That is not the policy, nor were we thinking about it in that regards. Fair enough? Scott S. -- (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
