To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.indylugOpen lugnet.org.us.indylug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / IndyLUG / 411
410  |  412
Subject: 
Re: Layout Ideas
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.indylug
Date: 
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 02:14:01 GMT
Viewed: 
428 times
  
If the tracks in the rail yard could be elevated by 2 bricks high we can use
a decoupling system from underneath and not have to be concerned so much
about how close the tracks are together.  The only problem I have ran into
in figuring this out is that no engine will be able to pass the decoupling
point, thus there would have to be a switch engine at the other end to move
the cars to the coupling point.

In lugnet.org.us.indylug, Thomas Garrison writes:
(2) and (2a) also speak to the question of coupling and decoupling.
Basically, there's lots of fun stuff we could do with a train yard/cargo
yard/roundhouse, with remote control by an operator, but it requires the
ability to decouple cars and engines remotely.  With the old layout, we
had this neat roundhouse, but we couldn't really do much more than show
off locos and run them into and out of the roundhouse; we could not, for
example, switch the loco pulling a train (quite aside from logistical
problems of having the roundhouse directly on a spur of our main loop)
because there was no decoupling mechanism.  I don't know how to automate
this process, but the mechanism will have an impact on the layout.  For
example, in Jeramy's proposed layout there was this big rail yard, where
the rails were very close together.  This would require decouplers that
came up from beneath the tracks (not enough room beside the tracks),
requiring elevating the whole area (or sinking the table)---doable, but
something to think about beforehand.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Layout Ideas
 
Correction to my last posting concerning the under track mounted decoupler system. With only a slight adjustment, (removal of a piece I didn't need) the system I designed for under track mounting is passable by all normal cars and motors and seems (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.us.indylug)

Message is in Reply To:
  Layout Ideas
 
I don't have a concrete layout, but I do have some ideas, specs, and issues, at least some of which need to be decided upon before we can decide on a layout. General Design Principles for the Layout: (1) The layout should be designed to consist of (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.org.us.indylug)

6 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR