Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 14:01:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1613 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us, Frank Filz writes:
> That's a good way to put it. I've probably stepped over the line some in this
> discussion,
For what it's worth, I do think that you've been annoying about your notes, but
no one of them was bad...it's just that you're harping on the issue. :-)
> though I am of course
> free to state that I wouldn't belong to a group which had policies similar to
> NELUGs.
Is that true? I suspect that if the NELUG members really approach unanimity on
this, then there won't be enough momentum to have a second active club in
Boston. That means that if you lived in that area, there would be a nice
active club for AFOLs and you wouldn't go? I'd go. I'm not in favor of their
rule, but I'd go and have a good time. And I'd express my views to people in
person and maybe build positive change.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) but (...) Well, I am trying to steer the discussion to something more constructive, but perhaps it's a lost cause. (...) on (...) From the outside it's hard to say. It is something I feel strongly about. I also earlier this year started down a (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) That's a good way to put it. I've probably stepped over the line some in this discussion, unfortunately the discussion has become somewhat heated. I think we need to step back a bit, and make sure we're not calling each other names for the (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
