Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto, the Road Ahead/VM Questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:30:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
366 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug writes:
> Breaking the spirit of the rule should engender admiration for
> the person who broke it because they found a fun and clever loophole and it
> was neat to see them exploit it (1) and they should be promptly praised and
> then shouted down... breaking rules should not engender resentment for that
> person because they unfairly exploited an inadvertant mistake by the organizers.
...
> 1 - e.g. the "long long stick" method of scree crossing was clearly done for
> humor and style points as a lark, not to actually seriously win... another
It was? Oh, I mean... it was!
> entry by the same contestant was serious and was a very strong contender
> (duh, it actually won!) and honored the rules including honoring them in spirit.
"X-bot" just happened to be lighter and faster than Doug C's 18 track, 6
motor, 2 battery-box monster "Too Much".
But it was a challenge to (1) win by using the loophole in the rules and (2)
win by staying withing the spirit of the rules.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: rtlToronto, the Road Ahead/VM Questions
|
| (...) You and me both! I wish you'd fix your posting mechanism though, if you could, because it's breaking threads. This is none of my business as I have little standing, but here's my 1.285 cents (2 cents canadian) anyway... The ideal set of rules (...) (22 years ago, 22-Aug-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
