 | | Re: Train? thoughts —Jeff Elliott
|
| | | (...) Cool! I didn't know the wide turns came out so close to even with the geometry. (...) Jeff, you should think about where your dam would be coolest - we *could* have a river gorge coming down under the trestle and feeding your module... (...) (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Train? thoughts —Derek Raycraft
|
| | | | (...) Ya, I was just playing around and that pattern of straight - curve - straight - curve seemed to work. (...) That's what I was thinking too, it just got to confusing trying to edit the tracks under there. (...) Cool, I like that. (...) Ya, I (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Train? thoughts —Jeff Van Winden
|
| | | | (...) Ok first of all, here is an image and the actual track draw layout for everyone to play with (i have added a swith point between the inner and outer tracks.... Deep Links: (URL) folder: (URL) also added in the Dam Module, to show Road and (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Train? thoughts —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | (...) If you pass in three tracks and passout three tracks, then one module, 96x96. The shed is 96 long and 48 wide, the facade is 96x16, and that leaves a 96x32 (three road plate) stretch out front. Let's not get too "territorial"-one of the (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
