 | | Re: entertaining spectators —Bruce Sheridan
|
| | | (...) You know....some people (people who know how to code) call it assembler. I could code this thing in my sleep! (...) You could use 100 RCXs with or without infrared and still never come close to beating me...My advice...take your very best (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: entertaining spectators —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) Do I even have to mention... 1st place, 2nd place, 1st place... (and train guy to boot!!) The way I see it, the only ones that can even come close to my record are Iain and Rob (and note how they aren't getting involved in this)... Dave walks (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: entertaining spectators —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | (...) Oh, and one more point for high tauntage factor--I'm doing the whole thing with 1 (one, uno, less than 2 or more) RCX, *and* my bot's not much bigger than the 32x32 baseplate. So there -- Nyaah Nyaah Nyaah!!! Dave Pretend I'm not getting into (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: entertaining spectators —Bruce Sheridan
|
| | | | | | Hi Dave, You know, I was only going after Chris cause he started it (and of course, he deserves it in a major way)…but now you’ve gone and thrown that gauntlet down. Firstly, I’m not even sure if the rules allow me to discuss technical stuff with (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: entertaining spectators —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) Of course Chris deserves it (...) Consider it down, my friend... (...) I *own* LEGO bricks-- I don't care what form they come in... (...) I was thinking about doing the x axis of my 'bot on train rails. Maybe I'll redesign my 'bot to do just (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: entertaining spectators —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) You already know this, of course, but for the benefit of those that don't... watch out for hysteresis... the train motor motion will need to be sensed independently. Still, what an interesting application if you do it! (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: entertaining spectators -- trash talk —Chris Magno
|
| | | | !!!GAME ON!!! (...) that's what you must have done when you coded your block stacker, if I recall it was you who showed up all forlorn and depressed crying that his RCX was broken. Geesh, It was ME who "fixed" your "broken" rcx by flashing new (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: entertaining spectators -- trash talk —Bruce Sheridan
|
| | | | (...) Chris, Chris, Chris, Chris, Chris…Confused as always…I won block stackers (remember a 9 block stack vs your 1 or 2 block stack)…Your thinking of that insignificant ‘get your blocks off off my side’ contest. I think Dave 'won' that one but, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
