 | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —Chris Magno
|
| | | (...) Sorry, Richard. I cant speak for Calum. I can speak for me. I personally was not going to wade into this BUT you did bring up my name. I was not/ am not hanging my head in shame. What happened, happened. It was unfortunate that Iain, did not (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Because of the web interface, what you or anyone else say in "your" NG is hardly private. Many if not most view any post no matter which NG it's in. You may think you "get away" with stuff, but that's only an illusion. -John (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Buddhism —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | | | | I'll adopt Ben’s Zen state-of-mind to answer this question: (...) And illusion? Perhaps… But if the group collectively embraces it, it becomes our reality. And in this organization we dictate the state of the matrix. Therefore, if we should so (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —Dave Johann
|
| | | | | | (...) True, but in their defense, anyone using the web interface has the ability to filter out that which they don't want to see. At that point only crossposting would enable you to see what they were talking about. -Dave (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | | (...) Richard: In some ways, yes, but I see your point and it is a valid one. I'm glad SOMEONE is defending free speech, even though the TOS is clearly stated. I also had a good chuckle-you're a funny guy, I liked your immediate response to Tim :) (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) Here's one 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | | | | (...) But you’re an honorary Member! After all, you took part in the 1st rtlToronto Train Event!!! --==Richard==-- (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Honorary member! —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Cool! You guys are always welcome at Aussie events, too! I won't feel so worried about lurking here any more! (...) And a great event it was too! A big hello (and have fun!) to all for Train3 this weekend! ROSCO (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | | | (...) Of course we know you, Ross! Calum (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) It displays all groups to which the message will be posted in the authorisation mail. They're above the actual message, on a line titled "Newsgroups" (...) They're already there, as well. Right up the top. Though many people (including myself, (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) —Jeff Van Winden
|
| | | | <BIG SNIP> (...) Did anyone else notice that Chris has mentioned trains before robots..... Jeff VW (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) Oh I did notice that, but somehow didn't reply! Mayhaps Chris is coming over to the fence where I'm always sitting. Dave (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) —Chris Magno
|
| | | | (...) WRONG!!!!!! that is all. I had a HUGE reply to this that slashed through several other posts and even used some colourful language. BUT i erased it. Chris Pretend that people from outside the GTA will read this. OOPs, no need to pretend. (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On the lighter side.... was (Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) Fine. Leave me sitting *alone*, all by myself, on the fence between the trainees and the techies... <*snif*> Dave Pretend that I'm not feeling *really* lonely right now in my own little LEGO world ;) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
