Subject:
|
Re: Programming, NQC and the RCX
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:46:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
960 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys writes:
> K folks, I have a programming problem :(
> I set an array of 16 (go figure)
> and I have a few misceelaneous int values (4 thus far)
> and I try to set up another aray of 16 and it gives me something equalling
> an out of memory error! Grrr!!
As the others have said, 32 variables is the limit for the standard
firmware. The new 2.0 firmware gives you a bit more (I think you can have a
few more global variables). But, heres my take on the matter: Why do you
need two 1x16 arrays? I came up with a NQC program that uses only one 1x16
array. If you are using one array to store the pattern that the gameboard
should be in, and use the other array to store the present status of the
gameboard, couldn't you combine this? Heres what I did: Initialize the array
to represent the correct x pattern. Blocks can be 1 and empties 0. Now, as
the robot sees the board, check what you see against what is curently in the
array, and update it if necessary. Does this help or am I way off track?
Rob
the mechanical engineer says don't be mechanically rude :)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Programming, NQC and the RCX
|
| K folks, I have a programming problem :( Here's the issue: I set an array of 16 (go figure) and I have a few misceelaneous int values (4 thus far) and I try to set up another aray of 16 and it gives me something equalling an out of memory error! (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
