| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Iain Hendry writes:
> This is so difficult. :(
>
> I've got like five different EOAT concepts here for my robot, and every time
> I think I have it, I get stuck. THIS IS SO FRUSTRATING.
>
> I almost refuse to go to a two-motor setup, simply because of the difficulty
> in controlling that remotely (it basically necissitates that at least one
> motor be mounted on the effector, and that's not a viable option).
>
> Grr. I'd give anything to see that tool Jeff's come up with. Bugger. :)
That's where Mario and I are having trouble too. I had a dead simple
mechanism that just gripped and another motor drove a small rack up to pull
the piece up. I even used a flaxle to drive the gripper so I wouldn't have
to weight the EOAT down. Problem is it's real flaky.
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: rtl10/EOAT Woes
|
| "Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:Gp4FqG.GHA@lugnet.com... (...) pull (...) have (...) I *think* I've got it. This new one is so compact! I LOVE THE 4x4 TRUCK PARTS SO MUCH. :) Iain (23 years ago, 29-Dec-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | rtl10/EOAT Woes
|
| This is so difficult. :( I've got like five different EOAT concepts here for my robot, and every time I think I have it, I get stuck. THIS IS SO FRUSTRATING. I almost refuse to go to a two-motor setup, simply because of the difficulty in controlling (...) (23 years ago, 29-Dec-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
