Subject:
|
Re: NXT software -- my view
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:13:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1648 times
|
| |
|
|
On 1/20/07, Chris Magno wrote:
> basic?
c'mon Chris - stop crying for a 1963 language and move to a more
modern 1972 language (or at least a reasonable facsimile of it)
http://bricxcc.sourceforge.net/nbc/
Here is a simple sample to drive forward then back. IF you can use
mindscript this syntax should be manageable:
#include "NXCDefs.h"
task main()
{
OnFwd(OUT_A, 75);
OnFwd(OUT_B, 75);
Wait(4000);
OnRev(OUT_AB, 75);
Wait(4000);
Off(OUT_AB);
}
If not, I'd be willing to borrow your NXT... just to keep the dust off it :)
-Rob A>
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: NXT software -- my view
|
| (...) I understand where Chris is coming from....generally Chris doesn't bother spelling or using punctuation. So how can you expect him to type function names, use curly braces and end every function call with a semicolon? Calum (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: NXT software -- my view
|
| (...) (URL) right. Basic is stupid. NO ONE uses basic. its a DUMB language that NO ONE in the YEAR 2007 USE's NOPE.. no one. (sigh) (...) I will have to see this NBC again. maybe I need to TRY once again to attempt this C thing. I with there was a C (...) (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NXT software -- my view
|
| (...) the last software for the RCX was the LEGO SDK 2.5. it had a nice MINDSCRIPT software that was neiter BASIC, not C. SOMEONE at lego seemed to thing there was a need for it. so why not for the NXT? Chris basic? basic? buller? (18 years ago, 20-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
