 | | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
Derek Raycraft wrote: > On 22-Nov-05, at 6:10 AM, Calum Tsang wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> The product of many long debates, rtlToronto20: Project Y's draft >> rules are now >> posted: >> >> (URL) > > > Two questions about the interface. > > If I (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) I would agree on Chris' interpretation. We'll update the page if no one objects. (...) I forgot to highlight it in "read" but I figured it needed to be debated. I think it must be a uniform colour and in fact I think that colour should be (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) No, I just wanted clarification. 16 studs on centre is fine with me. (...) I'm happy with that. (...) So you are saying there should be clearance for a EOAT to enter to at least 4 studs into the TO. But as long as my TO opening is 8 studs by 7 (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) Right, just a 8 dot by 7 brick frame that is a dot thick. But there should be a physical space 3 dots deep behind it. (...) I originally wrote it such that if you were to put a tool in front of the TO, then it needs to be collapsable flat to (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) In a sense you're messing yourself up if you do. If I can't deliver a brick into your robot because you stuck something in the way it's your loss. But then it's also my loss because I'm wasting time trying to interface properly but I can't (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
