 | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? —Rob Antonishen
|
| | | (...) But if you subscribe via email, the from is unmangled. So a smammer would just have to subscribe for a while and collect all the "from" addressed (the reply-to is set to the mailing list, however) and bingo - has a nice big list of valid (...) (19 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? —Derek Raycraft
|
| | | | | (...) Shhhh, Quite you. Derek (19 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Well bother. Shows what I know, I haven't subscribed to LUGNET via email (or used a newsreader to read it, for that matter) since forever. Never mind then, I guess. XFut admin.general, this issue affects more than just this group. (19 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) A spammer that goes to that muvh trouble to get our addresses cannot be blocked by automatic tools. All spamblocks are designed to protect against generic spam bots, not humans or custom written bots. (19 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam? —Rob Antonishen
|
| | | | (...) Dan- Not complaining, just observing :) I'm just surprised that if the effort was made to munge the web display of email addresses, no such effort was made in the email portion... You just can't win against spammers. For example, When I hit (...) (19 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
