Subject:
|
Re: the deed as I see it.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:21:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
564 times
|
| |
|
|
John Guerquin wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
> >
> > > I did up my own MOC as what the standard MIGHT look like,
> > >
> > > sorry for the colours. i am running out of all black.
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.thepyroguys.com/1.JPG
> > > http://www.thepyroguys.com/2.JPG
> > > http://www.thepyroguys.com/3.JPG
> > >
> > > 1. thats the next game.
> >
> > I have no problem with getting any EOAT into the square hole when the 'bots are> lined up properly.
> >
> > I have a huge problem with getting the 'bots to line up properly.
> >
> > for example, if you're little square hole 'bot was facing the exact opposite
> > direction, how would your arm-bot get around the square 'bot and know that the
> > side has a hole on it--unless all our 'bots are going to be like the 'visual
> > impared museum' where you're in physical contact with the other 'bot as you
> > drive around it trying to find the opening...
>
>
> OK, I'm beginning to like this HITW idea. Seems more interesting and
> challenging than having open-top hoppers driving around (or standing still).
>
> Who's to say that your bot can't be a square, with 3 HITW, one on each side, and
> on the 4th side your EOAT DNA dispenser? Increases the chances of others making
> a successful deposit threefold.
HECK, you have 12", and we havent decided on a HITW or SIZE of the HITW.
so there is NOTHING to stop you from building as many inputs as you
can cram into 12" cubed.
> Just define that your HITW needs a minimum height, width, and is a specific
> height off the ground. Minimum one HITW. Bot cannot be open-topped though.
>
> Multiplication of received and successfully dispensed bricks may work very well.
> It would discourage bots that excel at only one of the tasks.
the more i think about it, the more i like this idea.
your score is multiplied BY how many DNA sees you plant to how many you
get.
this forces box's to at least TRY to plant one seed.
WAIT... this is good and devious. cause not only do you have to PLANT a
seed to score, you have to GET a seed as well.
OMG. OKOKOKOK
i like it.
> Yes, dumb luck will be a factor. But it always is, no?
> The challenge will be to make a bot that is EASY - not too picky about receiving
> DNA, and easily finding mates to make quick deposits.
>
> I like it!
>
> John
its about TIME someone else agrees
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: the deed as I see it.
|
| (...) OK, I'm beginning to like this HITW idea. Seems more interesting and challenging than having open-top hoppers driving around (or standing still). Who's to say that your bot can't be a square, with 3 HITW, one on each side, and on the 4th side (...) (19 years ago, 21-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
