 | | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Steve's point is correct. Even with a 2x4 above or below, you still need to build the entire frame to hold the beam 2x4, then build the broomstick/bottom 2x4 too if you want pull it. If this option wasn't in the game, then players only need a (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Look back was rtlToronto9, Show Me the Monkey, the one with the ladder like thing in the video? (It was pre-me-n-rtlT, so I don't know) Was the complexity of the "playfield" such that there were less competators? Did most people build a mockup (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Well that's their choice if they want to use that beam. I say if they're going to do that, let them build that structure (if they want - I certainly don't think it's necissary for proving a concept). It's just pushing a beam/pulling a beam. (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) I took a short section of 2x4 and drilled holes in it, and stuck in some short pieces of dowel the same OD as the pipe we used for the real thing. 4 rungs I think. It was easy to mock up. For the next one it'll be easy, because everyone just (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) I would guess yes, and definitely yes. I don't think this should stop us, but it is a concern. Plus someone has to build the contest one. So it can't be so complex that we can't even get one built. Derek (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
On Thu, March 3, 2005 4:56 pm, Iain Hendry said: (...) What about changing the contest, so the goal is to RAISE your side of the beam? Robots start on the end. Lighter is better. Not sure if it's a better contest, just different. But it seems like (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) This is the second time I've gasped reading one of your suggestions today. Good show! :) You bring up an awesome point - anyone can build a HEAVY robot. But it takes real skill to lighten things up. I like this even more now. We don't need a (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Brilliant! I really like the idea of raising your end..... It even give you an ideal "null" competitor.....an empty beam :) -Rob A> (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Lifting your side is cool--it also solves the broomstick problem should someone want to drop a leg to the floor. But then it sort of encourages a sumo like approach, because to win, you need to either drop a leg OR fight the other robot to get (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Wouldn't I just have to drive my 'bot to the other side? No 'bots on my side would make my end go up (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Wouldn't I just have to drop off the beam to make my side go up? Derek (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Sure. But then what? Coz' what if he's trying to drive over to your side, hmm? :) (Wow, it sure is obvious when everyone rolls out of bed and into work!) ::giggles:: Iain (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Sounds like a valid strategy to me! See, this has totally opened up what methods people might use to get the task done. This is awesome. If we leave it this open-ended, imagine how many different solutions we might see come game day! Iain (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
On Fri, March 4, 2005 10:13 am, Iain Hendry said: (...) So many strategies. All very simple. They all work. What works best? (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) And that my friends is the spirit of competition. I am so pumped about this! rtlBeamPumping1 Iain (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) I think you at least have to stay on the beam. Otherwise, EVERYONE will jump off the beam. What kind of a contest is that? The other issue I can think of is JeffE style loopholing :). I can see JeffE driving up from California, leaving a Lego (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) For me, it's more difficult to raise my opponents end. That stops the JeffE sticker thing. So I think we should work on the premise of bringing our end down. (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Okay, if anyone builds a robot that "leaps off" the beam, more power to them. That would be amazing. Unless they are kamakaze.* Besides, that doesn't guarentee you a win at all. (...) And what did we decide about that? I think it was that we (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Quite you. That's what I was going to do. Derek (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) LOL! I was actually thinking of just a lone 2x4 brick. (...) I vote for (b) lower your end of the beam (raise your opponent's end). My thoughts: If we want to RAISE our end, then we would could end up with "sumo on a 2x4" because each robot (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Hmm, I think that a) getting over the bit of beam sticking down to keep the thing in stable equlibrium, and b) working through that tiny opening in the structure will present insurmountable headaches. I don't see that happening very easily at (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
