| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote:
> Well more like this:
> a) if you're going to be a dink and build a wall there...
> b) ...the rules state you can be that close, so be that close.
So, I have a robot (my second design) that sits pretty close to the side of the
board. I'm pretty sure you'll call me a dink for building it because it sits
close to the edge, but that's how it's designed.
A robot like this would be much easier to change (to back farther from the
board) than squeezing a front-mounted robot into the area allowed.
That's why I'm curious; of the people actually building robots, who does and who
doesn't have problems with the size.
Is there anyone who has had to deal with this, yet?
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Play Area
|
| (...) You're only a dink if you deliberately put something there for the purpose of interfering. If that was the way it came out, fine. All I'm saying is if someone's going to be a prick and do that, then that's just being stupid. Calum (21 years ago, 24-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: Play Area
|
| (...) seeing as you are entering more than ONE robot, and the second one "needs" to be a "Wall" up the side of game board, and you, yourself just said that "...A robot like this would be much easier to change..." then why do it? be nice and back (...) (21 years ago, 25-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Play Area
|
| (...) Well more like this: a) if you're going to be a dink and build a wall there and complain, you can go back to Indiana. (Random state, honest!) b) if someone honestly built right to the edge and another robot interferes with it, I'm siding with (...) (21 years ago, 24-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
